Hioki T, Sugimura Y, Sakurai M, Hayashi N, Tochigi H, Kawamura J, Yatani R
Department of Urology, Mie University School of Medicine.
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1990 Aug;36(8):921-6.
To evaluate the correlation between the histological grade and the prognosis, we reviewed 100 cases of prostatic cancer according to the Japanese General Rules of Prostatic Cancer (JGRPC) and Gleason grading system. The study led to the following results: (1) There was a close relation between the JGRPC grade and Gleason score (GS). (2) The JGRPC grade and Gleason score were equally concerned with the clinical stage. (3) There were significant differences in survival rate between well and moderately, well and poorly differentiated groups by the JGRPC grading system, and between GS 2-4 and GS 5-7, GS 2-4 and GS 8-10 groups by Gleason score. (4) In proportion to the JGRPC grade, the cancer death rate increased linearly in each stage. (5) When the patients were grouped according to their JGRPC grades of main lesion and accompanied lesion, the cancer death rate increased in the cases with lower differentiated elements. We conclude that the JGRPC grading system is easily comprehensible, and equal with the Gleason grading system to predict the prognosis of prostatic cancer.
为评估组织学分级与预后之间的相关性,我们根据日本前列腺癌通用规则(JGRPC)和 Gleason 分级系统对 100 例前列腺癌病例进行了回顾。研究得出以下结果:(1)JGRPC 分级与 Gleason 评分(GS)之间存在密切关系。(2)JGRPC 分级和 Gleason 评分与临床分期同样相关。(3)根据 JGRPC 分级系统,高分化与中分化、高分化与低分化组之间的生存率存在显著差异;根据 Gleason 评分,GS 2 - 4 与 GS 5 - 7、GS 2 - 4 与 GS 8 - 10 组之间的生存率也存在显著差异。(4)根据 JGRPC 分级,各阶段的癌症死亡率呈线性增加。(5)当根据主要病变和伴随病变的 JGRPC 分级对患者进行分组时,低分化成分的病例癌症死亡率增加。我们得出结论,JGRPC 分级系统易于理解,在预测前列腺癌预后方面与 Gleason 分级系统相当。