Suppr超能文献

大脑中的偏见:先验概率和潜在收益的扩散模型分析。

Bias in the brain: a diffusion model analysis of prior probability and potential payoff.

机构信息

Cognitive Science Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1018 TV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;32(7):2335-43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4156-11.2012.

Abstract

In perceptual decision-making, advance knowledge biases people toward choice alternatives that are more likely to be correct and more likely to be profitable. Accumulation-to-bound models provide two possible explanations for these effects: prior knowledge about the relative attractiveness of the alternatives at hand changes either the starting point of the decision process, or the rate of evidence accumulation. Here, we used model-based functional MRI to investigate whether these effects are similar for different types of prior knowledge, and whether there is a common neural substrate underlying bias in simple perceptual choices. We used two versions of the random-dot motion paradigm in which we manipulated bias by: (1) changing the prior likelihood of occurrence for two alternatives ("prior probability") and (2) assigning a larger reward to one of two alternatives ("potential payoff"). Human subjects performed the task inside and outside a 3T MRI scanner. For each manipulation, bias was quantified by fitting the drift diffusion model to the behavioral data. Individual measurements of bias were then used in the imaging analyses to identify regions involved in biasing choice behavior. Behavioral results showed that subjects tended to make more and faster choices toward the alternative that was most probable or had the largest payoff. This effect was primarily due to a change in the starting point of the accumulation process. Imaging results showed that, at cue level, regions of the frontoparietal network are involved in changing the starting points in both manipulations, suggesting a common mechanism underlying the biasing effects of prior knowledge.

摘要

在感知决策中,先验知识使人们偏向于更有可能正确和更有利可图的选择。积累到边界模型为这些效应提供了两种可能的解释:手头的备选方案相对吸引力的先验知识要么改变决策过程的起点,要么改变证据积累的速度。在这里,我们使用基于模型的功能磁共振成像来研究这些效应是否因不同类型的先验知识而不同,以及在简单感知选择中的偏差是否有一个共同的神经基础。我们使用了两种随机点运动范式版本,通过以下两种方式来操纵偏差:(1)改变两种备选方案的先验出现概率(“先验概率”),(2)为两种备选方案之一分配更大的奖励(“潜在收益”)。人类受试者在 3T MRI 扫描仪内外执行任务。对于每种操纵,通过将漂移扩散模型拟合到行为数据来量化偏差。然后,在成像分析中使用个体测量的偏差来识别参与偏差选择行为的区域。行为结果表明,受试者倾向于更频繁和更快地选择最有可能或收益最大的备选方案。这种效应主要是由于积累过程的起点发生了变化。成像结果表明,在提示水平,额顶网络中的区域参与了两种操纵中起点的改变,这表明先验知识的偏差效应有一个共同的机制。

相似文献

4
Perceptual decisions between multiple directions of visual motion.视觉运动多个方向之间的感知决策。
J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 23;28(17):4435-45. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5564-07.2008.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Brain-wide representations of prior information in mouse decision-making.小鼠决策过程中先验信息的全脑表征。
Nature. 2025 Sep;645(8079):192-200. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09226-1. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
5
Preparing to act follows Bayesian inference rules.准备行动遵循贝叶斯推理规则。
iScience. 2025 May 12;28(6):112645. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112645. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
7
Perceptual Decision-Making Regarding Phylogenetically Salient Stimuli.关于系统发育显著刺激的知觉决策
Affect Sci. 2024 Sep 26;6(1):145-158. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00271-z. eCollection 2025 Mar.
8
Prior Information Shapes Perceptual Confidence.先验信息塑造感知信心。
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 7;8(1):11. doi: 10.5334/joc.417. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice.简单选择过程中刺激值信号向运动指令的转换。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 1;108(44):18120-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109322108. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
7
How the brain integrates costs and benefits during decision making.大脑如何在决策过程中整合成本和收益。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 14;107(50):21767-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908104107. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验