National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jun;24(6):1462-75. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00224. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
Studies by cognitive psychologists, psychophysicists, neuroscientists, and economists provide ample evidence that humans use prior knowledge to bias decisions adaptively. In this study, we sought to locate and investigate the brain areas mediating this behavior. Participants viewed ambiguous abstract shapes and decided whether a shape was of Category A (smoother) or B (bumpier). The decision was made in the context of one of two prior knowledge cues, 80/20 and 50/50. The 80/20 cue indicated that upcoming shapes had an 80% probability of being of one category, for example, B, and a 20% probability of being of the other. The 50/50 cue indicated that upcoming shapes had an equal probability of being of either category. The shift in bias produced by the 80/20 cue relative to the 50/50 cue was of the predicted sign for every subject but varied in magnitude. We searched for brain regions in which activity changes correlated with the extent of the bias shift; these were dorsolateral pFC (middle frontal gyrus), inferior frontal junction, anterior insula, inferior parietal lobule, intraparietal sulcus, head of the caudate, posterior cingulate cortex, and fusiform gyrus. The findings indicate that an individual's brain activity in these regions reflects the extent to which that individual makes use of prior knowledge to bias decisions. We also created within-ROI tuning curves by binning the shape curvature levels and plotting brain activity levels at each of the nine bins. In the fronto-parietal and anterior insula ROIs, the tuning curves peaked at targets contraindicated by the prior knowledge cue (e.g., Category B targets if the 80/20 cue meant 20% probability B). The increased activity in these regions likely indicates a no-go response when sufficient perceptual evidence favored the alternative contraindicated by the 80/20 cue.
认知心理学家、心理物理学家、神经科学家和经济学家的研究为人类利用先验知识适应性地做出决策提供了充分的证据。在这项研究中,我们试图定位和研究介导这种行为的大脑区域。参与者观看了模糊的抽象形状,并决定一个形状是属于 A 类(更平滑)还是 B 类(更粗糙)。这个决定是在两个先验知识提示中的一个的背景下做出的,即 80/20 和 50/50。80/20 提示表示接下来的形状有 80%的概率属于一个类别,例如 B,20%的概率属于另一个类别。50/50 提示表示接下来的形状属于任一类别。80/20 提示相对于 50/50 提示产生的偏差变化的符号与每个受试者的预测一致,但幅度不同。我们搜索了与偏差变化程度相关的大脑区域,这些区域包括背外侧额前皮质(额中回)、下额额连接、前岛叶、下顶叶、顶内沟、尾状核头、后扣带皮质和梭状回。这些发现表明,个体在这些区域的大脑活动反映了个体利用先验知识来偏置决策的程度。我们还通过将形状曲率水平分类并在每个九个分类中绘制大脑活动水平,创建了 ROI 内调谐曲线。在前额顶叶和前岛叶 ROI 中,调谐曲线在与先验知识提示相矛盾的目标处达到峰值(例如,如果 80/20 提示意味着 B 的概率为 20%,则 B 类目标)。这些区域的活动增加可能表明当足够的感知证据支持与 80/20 提示相矛盾的替代方案时,出现了不应反应。