Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Heart. 2012 May;98(9):691-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301247. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
Clinical prediction models are increasingly used to complement clinical reasoning and decision-making in modern medicine, in general, and in the cardiovascular domain, in particular. To these ends, developed models first and foremost need to provide accurate and (internally and externally) validated estimates of probabilities of specific health conditions or outcomes in the targeted individuals. Subsequently, the adoption of such models by professionals must guide their decision-making, and improve patient outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of care. In the first paper of this series of two companion papers, issues relating to prediction model development, their internal validation, and estimating the added value of a new (bio)marker to existing predictors were discussed. In this second paper, an overview is provided of the consecutive steps for the assessment of the model's predictive performance in new individuals (external validation studies), how to adjust or update existing models to local circumstances or with new predictors, and how to investigate the impact of the uptake of prediction models on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes (impact studies). Each step is illustrated with empirical examples from the cardiovascular field.
临床预测模型越来越多地被用于补充现代医学中的临床推理和决策,特别是在心血管领域。为此,开发的模型首先需要提供针对特定个体的特定健康状况或结果的概率的准确且(内部和外部)验证的估计。随后,专业人员采用此类模型必须指导他们的决策,并改善患者的结果和护理的成本效益。在这两篇系列论文中的第一篇中,讨论了与预测模型开发、内部验证以及估计新(生物)标志物对现有预测因子的附加值相关的问题。在第二篇论文中,提供了评估新个体中模型预测性能的连续步骤的概述(外部验证研究),如何调整或更新现有模型以适应本地情况或使用新的预测因子,以及如何研究预测模型对临床决策和患者结果的影响(影响研究)。每个步骤都用来自心血管领域的实证示例来说明。