Department of Animal and Poultry Science, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Pakdasht, Tehran, 33916-53755 Iran.
Poult Sci. 2012 Apr;91(4):918-27. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01844.
This study was conducted with broilers to evaluate the effects of growth-promoting antibiotic (flavomycin) and probiotic (7 bacterial species) supplementation in diets containing soybean oil or free fatty acids (FFA) on performance, morphological parameters of the small intestine, apparent digestibility of gross energy (GE) in the ileum, and apparent digestibility of fat in the ileum and total intestinal tract. Eight-hundred and sixty 4-d-old Ross 308 broiler chicks were used in a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement of dietary treatments that comprised 3 additives (without additive, flavomycin, and probiotic) and 3 fat sources (without fat, 30 g/kg of FFA, and 30 g/kg of soybean oil) with 4 pen replicates per treatment. All diets contained chromic oxide (3 g/kg) as an indigestible marker. Body weight and feed intake were recorded weekly over 40 d. Flavomycin interacted positively with soybean oil and FFA causing improvements (P < 0.05) in BW gain. Among the different fat sources, soybean oil significantly increased (P < 0.05) BW gain and jejunal villi height, whereas flavomycin improved (P < 0.05) BW gain and feed conversion when compared with the remaining dietary additives. However, the probiotic negatively affected (P < 0.05) BW gain and feed conversion despite increased (P < 0.05) villi heights of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. At 21 and 38 d of age, fat and GE digestibility were higher (P < 0.05) in the ileum and total intestinal tract of birds fed diets containing soybean oil than those of birds fed FFA. Fat and GE digestibility were highest (P < 0.05) among birds fed flavomycin but lowest (P < 0.05) among probiotic-fed birds. Flavomycin addition to soybean oil or FFA diets significantly increased (P < 0.05) fat and GE digestibility when compared with the same diets containing the probiotic. Therefore, soybean oil is a better energy source than FFA, as indicated by increased growth, nutrient digestibility, and jejunal villi height. However, probiotic supplementation to fat-rich diets caused detrimental effects on nutrient digestibility and growth.
本研究以肉鸡为对象,评估在含有大豆油或游离脂肪酸(FFA)的日粮中添加促生长抗生素(黄霉素)和益生菌(7 种细菌)对生产性能、小肠形态参数、回肠总能表观消化率、回肠和全肠道脂肪表观消化率的影响。采用 3×3 因子设计,日粮处理包括 3 种添加剂(无添加剂、黄霉素和益生菌)和 3 种脂肪源(无脂肪、30g/kgFFA 和 30g/kg 大豆油),每个处理设 4 个重复。所有日粮均添加三氧化二铬(3g/kg)作为不消化标记物。在 40d 内每周记录体重和采食量。黄霉素与大豆油和 FFA 互作,提高(P<0.05)了 BW 增益。在不同的脂肪源中,大豆油显著提高(P<0.05)了 BW 增益和空肠绒毛高度,而黄霉素与其他日粮添加剂相比,提高了(P<0.05)BW 增益和饲料转化率。然而,益生菌降低了(P<0.05)BW 增益和饲料转化率,尽管十二指肠、空肠和回肠的绒毛高度增加(P<0.05)。在 21 和 38d 时,饲喂大豆油日粮的鸡回肠和全肠道的脂肪和 GE 消化率高于饲喂 FFA 的鸡(P<0.05)。黄霉素组的脂肪和 GE 消化率最高(P<0.05),而益生菌组的最低(P<0.05)。与添加益生菌的相同日粮相比,黄霉素添加到大豆油或 FFA 日粮中显著提高(P<0.05)了脂肪和 GE 消化率。因此,与 FFA 相比,大豆油是更好的能量来源,表现为生长、养分消化率和空肠绒毛高度增加。然而,益生菌对富含脂肪的日粮的添加对养分消化率和生长产生了不利影响。