Villarreal F J, Lew W Y
Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Diego, California.
Am J Physiol. 1990 Nov;259(5 Pt 2):H1409-18. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1990.259.5.H1409.
Piezoelectric crystals were implanted in the anterior and posterior midwall of the left ventricle in six anesthetized dogs to compare regional two-dimensional finite deformations. Increasing left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) from 3 to 18 mmHg caused a similar expansion in the end-diastolic configuration (similar end-diastolic principal strains), but maximal lengthening was more circumferential in the anterior wall (-18 +/- 13 degrees) and more longitudinal in the posterior wall (-54 +/- 19 degrees). End-diastolic in-plane shears were negative in both regions, consistent with a left-handed diastolic torsion. As LVEDP increased, maximal shortening strains increased similarly (similar end-systolic principal strains), but there was a preferential increase in end-systolic circumferential strain in the anterior wall and preferential increase in longitudinal strain in the posterior wall. End-systolic in-plane shears were small and positive in both regions. The circumferential strain accurately reflected maximal end-diastolic and end-systolic principal strains in the anterior wall at mid and high LVEDP but underestimated the maximal end-diastolic principal strain by 50% and the maximal end-systolic principal strain by 30% in the posterior wall at all LVEDPs. We conclude that the magnitude of end-diastolic and end-systolic strains is similar for anterior and posterior walls over a wide range of LVEDP. However, there are regional differences in the directions of maximal deformation that should be considered when evaluating regional ventricular function.
在六只麻醉犬的左心室前、后壁植入压电晶体,以比较局部二维有限变形。将左心室舒张末期压力(LVEDP)从3 mmHg提高到18 mmHg,导致舒张末期形态出现类似的扩张(类似的舒张末期主应变),但前壁的最大伸长更多为圆周方向(-18±13度),后壁更多为纵向方向(-54±19度)。两个区域的舒张末期平面内剪切均为负值,与左旋舒张期扭转一致。随着LVEDP增加,最大缩短应变类似地增加(类似的收缩末期主应变),但前壁收缩末期圆周应变优先增加,后壁纵向应变优先增加。两个区域的收缩末期平面内剪切均较小且为正值。圆周应变在LVEDP处于中高水平时准确反映了前壁舒张末期和收缩末期的最大主应变,但在所有LVEDP水平下,后壁舒张末期最大主应变低估了50%,收缩末期最大主应变低估了30%。我们得出结论,在较宽的LVEDP范围内,前壁和后壁舒张末期和收缩末期应变的大小相似。然而,在评估局部心室功能时,应考虑最大变形方向上的局部差异。