Suppr超能文献

ICU 患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CR-BSI):是否拔除中心静脉导管的决策。

Catheter related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) in ICU patients: making the decision to remove or not to remove the central venous catheter.

机构信息

Critical Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032687. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 150 million central venous catheters (CVC) are used each year in the United States. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) are one of the most important complications of the central venous catheters (CVCs). Our objective was to compare the in-hospital mortality when the catheter is removed or not removed in patients with CR-BSI.

METHODS

We reviewed all episodes of CR-BSI that occurred in our intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2000 to December 2008. The standard method was defined as a patient with a CVC and at least one positive blood culture obtained from a peripheral vein and a positive semi quantitative (>15 CFU) culture of a catheter segment from where the same organism was isolated. The conservative method was defined as a patient with a CVC and at least one positive blood culture obtained from a peripheral vein and one of the following: (1) differential time period of CVC culture versus peripheral culture positivity of more than 2 hours, or (2) simultaneous quantitative blood culture with ≥ 5:1 ratio (CVC versus peripheral).

RESULTS

53 CR-BSI (37 diagnosed by the standard method and 16 by the conservative method) were diagnosed during the study period. There was a no statistically significant difference in the in-hospital mortality for the standard versus the conservative method (57% vs. 75%, p = 0.208) in ICU patients.

CONCLUSION

In our study there was a no statistically significant difference between the standard and conservative methods in-hospital mortality.

摘要

背景

美国每年大约使用 1.5 亿根中心静脉导管(CVC)。导管相关血流感染(CR-BSI)是 CVC 最重要的并发症之一。我们的目的是比较 CR-BSI 患者在去除或不去除导管时的住院死亡率。

方法

我们回顾了 2000 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间我们重症监护病房(ICU)中发生的所有 CR-BSI 病例。标准方法定义为患者存在 CVC,且至少从外周静脉获得一次阳性血培养,且从导管段获得的半定量(>15 CFU)培养物中分离出相同的病原体。保守方法定义为患者存在 CVC,且至少从外周静脉获得一次阳性血培养,且符合以下一种情况:(1)导管培养与外周培养阳性的时间差超过 2 小时,或(2)同时进行定量血培养,CVC 与外周的比值≥5:1。

结果

在研究期间,共诊断出 53 例 CR-BSI(标准方法诊断 37 例,保守方法诊断 16 例)。在 ICU 患者中,标准方法与保守方法的住院死亡率无统计学差异(57%对 75%,p=0.208)。

结论

在我们的研究中,标准方法和保守方法在住院死亡率方面无统计学差异。

相似文献

10
Prevention of catheter-related blood stream infection: back to basics?导管相关血流感染的预防:回归基础?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Feb;12(1):27-32. doi: 10.1089/sur.2009.082. Epub 2010 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验