Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Aug;33(7):1337-42. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2980. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
PI improves routine EPI-based DWI by enabling higher spatial resolution and reducing geometric distortion, though it remains unclear which of these is most important. We evaluated the relative contribution of these factors and assessed their ability to increase lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence by using a GRAPPA technique.
Four separate DWI scans were obtained at 1.5T in 48 patients with independent variation of in-plane spatial resolution (1.88 mm(2) versus 1.25 mm(2)) and/or reduction factor (R = 1 versus R = 3). A neuroradiologist with access to clinical history and additional imaging sequences provided a reference standard diagnosis for each case. Three blinded neuroradiologists assessed scans for abnormalities and also evaluated multiple imaging-quality metrics by using a 5-point ordinal scale. Logistic regression was used to determine the impact of each factor on subjective image quality and confidence.
Reference standard diagnoses in the patient cohort were acute ischemic stroke (n = 30), ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic conversion (n = 4), intraparenchymal hemorrhage (n = 9), or no acute lesion (n = 5). While readers preferred both a higher reduction factor and a higher spatial resolution, the largest effect was due to an increased reduction factor (odds ratio, 47 ± 16). Small lesions were more confidently discriminated from artifacts on R = 3 images. The diagnosis changed in 5 of 48 scans, always toward the reference standard reading and exclusively for posterior fossa lesions.
PI improves DWI primarily by reducing geometric distortion rather than by increasing spatial resolution. This outcome leads to a more accurate and confident diagnosis of small lesions.
通过实现更高的空间分辨率和减少几何变形,PI 改善了常规基于 EPI 的 DWI,尽管尚不清楚这些因素中哪一个最重要。我们通过使用 GRAPPA 技术评估了这些因素的相对贡献,并评估了它们增加病变显著性和诊断信心的能力。
在 1.5T 上对 48 例患者进行了 4 次独立的 DWI 扫描,其平面空间分辨率(1.88mm²与 1.25mm²)和/或缩减因子(R=1 与 R=3)存在差异。一位具有临床病史和其他成像序列访问权限的神经放射科医师为每个病例提供了参考标准诊断。三位盲法神经放射科医师评估了扫描的异常情况,并使用 5 分有序量表评估了多个成像质量指标。采用逻辑回归来确定每个因素对主观图像质量和诊断信心的影响。
患者队列中的参考标准诊断为急性缺血性卒中(n=30)、缺血性卒中伴出血转化(n=4)、脑实质内出血(n=9)或无急性病变(n=5)。虽然读者更喜欢更高的缩减因子和更高的空间分辨率,但最大的影响归因于增加的缩减因子(比值比,47±16)。在 R=3 图像上,小病变与伪影的区分更具信心。48 次扫描中有 5 次诊断发生改变,始终向参考标准阅读结果转变,且仅为后颅窝病变。
PI 主要通过减少几何变形而不是通过提高空间分辨率来改善 DWI。这种结果导致对小病变的更准确和更有信心的诊断。