Suppr超能文献

静息状态下头部扩散加权成像扫描:1.5T场强下对缺血性脑卒中患者的初步临床评估

Quiet diffusion-weighted head scanning: Initial clinical evaluation in ischemic stroke patients at 1.5T.

作者信息

Rösch Julie, Ott Martin, Heismann Bjoern, Doerfler Arnd, Engelhorn Tobias, Sembritzki Klaus, Grodzki David M

机构信息

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Magnetic Resonance, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Nov;44(5):1238-1243. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25228. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the quality and diagnostic value of routine single-shot, echo-planar imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (ss-EPI-DWI) to those of quiet readout segmented EPI-DWI (q-DWI) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of acute stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients with acute stroke underwent a 1.5T MRI including diffusion-weighted ss-EPI and q-DWI. The two sequences were protocolled to have identical spatial resolution and spatial coverage. q-DWI was tested with (regular q-DWI) and without (fast q-DWI) averaging in 13 patients each. The acoustic noise generated by each sequence was measured. Quantitative and qualitative assessments regarding signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), lesion conspicuity, level of artifacts, overall image quality as well as diagnostic content were performed.

RESULTS

SNR and CNR values of the q-DWI scans were considerably higher than those of ss-EPI DWI (P ≤ 0.0078). No statistical difference was found for lesion conspicuity (P ≥ 0.125). Statistical differences were found for level of artifacts (P ≥ 0.0078) and overall image quality (P ≥ 0.002). Both were evaluated better in the ss-EPI DWI than in the regular and fast q-DWI. Apart from one fast q-DWI patient, radiologists voted the images to have the same diagnostic content, with upper 90% confidence limits of 0.238 for regular q-DWI and 0.429 for fast q-DWI.

CONCLUSION

If the acoustic burden is critical to the patient, q-DWI is an equivalent quiet alternative to ss-EPI DWI for use in stroke patients. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1238-1243.

摘要

目的

比较常规单次激发回波平面成像扩散加权成像(ss-EPI-DWI)与静音读出分段EPI-DWI(q-DWI)在急性脑卒中磁共振成像(MRI)中的图像质量和诊断价值。

材料与方法

26例急性脑卒中患者接受了1.5T MRI检查,包括扩散加权ss-EPI和q-DWI。这两个序列被设定为具有相同的空间分辨率和空间覆盖范围。13例患者分别接受了有平均处理(常规q-DWI)和无平均处理(快速q-DWI)的q-DWI检查。测量了每个序列产生的声学噪声。对信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)、病变清晰度、伪影水平、整体图像质量以及诊断内容进行了定量和定性评估。

结果

q-DWI扫描的SNR和CNR值显著高于ss-EPI DWI(P≤0.0078)。病变清晰度方面未发现统计学差异(P≥0.125)。伪影水平(P≥0.0078)和整体图像质量(P≥0.002)存在统计学差异。ss-EPI DWI在这两方面的评估均优于常规和快速q-DWI。除1例快速q-DWI患者外,放射科医生认为图像具有相同的诊断内容,常规q-DWI的90%置信上限为0.238,快速q-DWI为0.429。

结论

如果声学负担对患者至关重要,那么对于脑卒中患者,q-DWI是ss-EPI DWI的一种等效的静音替代方法。《磁共振成像杂志》2016年;44:1238 - 1243。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验