Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 2, Ghent, Belgium.
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(4):372-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.662187. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
This study examines the reliability and convergent validity of 2 versions of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS), one for use with Thematic Apperception Test narratives (SCORS-TAT; Westen, 1990) and one for use with clinical interview data (SCORS-CDI; Westen, Barends, Leigh, Mendel, & Silbert, 1990 ). Four SCORS dimensions were evaluated. Data were collected in a psychiatric sample (N = 74). Results show that although interrater reliability was good for all dimensions, internal consistency was low, especially for the affective dimensions. Structural equation modeling, in which a model with 2 factors (i.e., SCORS-TAT and SCORS-CDI) and 4 dimensions each was tested, indicated low convergence between corresponding dimensions of SCORS-TAT and SCORS-CDI. Correlational analyses suggested that this was due to a strong method factor. Regression analyses, however, revealed that the presence of a personality disorder operated as a moderator for convergence between corresponding cognitive-structural dimensions.
本研究考察了社会认知与客体关系量表（SCORS）的两个版本的可靠性和聚合效度，一个版本用于主题统觉测验叙述（SCORS-TAT；Westen，1990），另一个版本用于临床访谈数据（SCORS-CDI；Westen、Barends、Leigh、Mendel 和 Silbert，1990）。评估了四个 SCORS 维度。数据来自一个精神病学样本（N=74）。结果表明，尽管所有维度的评分者间信度都很好，但内部一致性较低，特别是情感维度。结构方程建模，其中测试了一个具有两个因素（即 SCORS-TAT 和 SCORS-CDI）和四个维度的模型，表明 SCORS-TAT 和 SCORS-CDI 的对应维度之间的收敛度低。相关分析表明，这是由于强烈的方法因素。然而，回归分析显示，人格障碍的存在是对应认知-结构维度之间收敛的调节因素。
