John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Crit Care Resusc. 2012 Mar;14(1):38-43.
To determine the impact on call characteristics and patient outcomes since the implementation of a two-tiered rapid-response system along with new observation charts and calling criteria.
A retrospective before-and-after study in an Australian tertiary referral hospital.
Consecutive adult patients (_18 years), who had a rapid-response call between June and October 2009 ("before") and between June and October 2010 ("after").
Incidence of "serious adverse events" (cardiac arrests, unexpected deaths, and unplanned intensive care unit/high-dependency unit [HDU] admissions); subsequent illness severity and ICU/HDU and hospital mortality and length of stay; episodes of repeat calls for the same patient, time since admission and treatment limitation/ not-for-resuscitation order profiles.
Statistically significant increase in number of rapid response calls from 14.3 to 21.2 per 1000 hospital admissions before and after, respectively (P < 0.001); this was associated with a 16% decrease in composite serious adverse events (not significant). There were no significant differences in the number of unplanned ICU/HDU admissions, admission severity scores and subsequent ICU/HDU and hospital mortality and length of stay. There was a significant increase in number of calls for patients who were admitted to hospital within 24 hours (2.5 v 4.7 per 1000 hospital admissions before and after, respectively; P < 0.05) and for patients who were transferred from acute care areas within 24 hours (3.7 v 6.2 per 1000 hospital admissions before and after, respectively; P < 0.05). There was a significant increase in number of repeat calls for the same patient (1.6 v 4.2 per 1000 hospital admissions before and after, respectively; P < 0.001); this was associated with higher mortality compared with single review in the after period (35.8% v 18.5%, respectively; P = 0.005).
Implementation of a two-tiered rapid-response system and new observation charts and calling criteria increased the number of rapid-response calls with a nonsignificant trend towards a decreased incidence of serious adverse events. Further improvements in care of hospitalised patients may be possible by preventing repeat calls or calls within 24 hours of hospital admission and discharge from acute care areas.
确定在实施双层快速反应系统以及新的观察图表和呼叫标准后,对呼叫特征和患者结局的影响。
在澳大利亚一家三级转诊医院进行的回顾性前后研究。
2009 年 6 月至 10 月期间(“前”)和 2010 年 6 月至 10 月期间(“后”)连续就诊的成年患者(≥18 岁)。
“严重不良事件”(心搏骤停、意外死亡和计划外重症监护病房/高度依赖病房[HDU]入院)的发生率;随后的疾病严重程度和 ICU/HDU 及医院死亡率和住院时间;同一患者的重复呼叫次数、入院后时间以及治疗限制/不复苏医嘱的情况。
快速反应呼叫的数量分别从每 1000 次入院 14.3 次增加到 21.2 次(P<0.001),具有统计学意义;这与复合严重不良事件的减少 16%(无统计学意义)相关。无计划的 ICU/HDU 入院人数、入院严重程度评分以及随后的 ICU/HDU 和医院死亡率和住院时间均无显著差异。在入院 24 小时内(前和后分别为每 1000 次入院 2.5 次和 4.7 次;P<0.05)和在入院 24 小时内从急性护理区转入的患者(前和后分别为每 1000 次入院 3.7 次和 6.2 次;P<0.05)的呼叫次数显著增加。同一患者的重复呼叫次数显著增加(前和后分别为每 1000 次入院 1.6 次和 4.2 次;P<0.001);与后期间的单次审查相比,死亡率更高(分别为 35.8%和 18.5%;P=0.005)。
实施双层快速反应系统以及新的观察图表和呼叫标准增加了快速反应呼叫的数量,严重不良事件的发生率呈下降趋势但无统计学意义。通过防止重复呼叫或在入院后 24 小时内以及从急性护理区出院时呼叫,可以进一步改善住院患者的护理。