School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Rapid Response System, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265485. eCollection 2022.
Repeat Rapid Response Team (RRT) calls are associated with increased in-hospital mortality risk and pose an organisation-level resource burden. Use of Non-Technical Skills (NTS) at calls has the potential to reduce potentially preventable repeat calling. NTS are usually improved through training, although this consumes time and financial resources. Re-designing the Rapid Response System (RRS) to promote use of NTS may provide a feasible alternative.
A pre-post observational study was undertaken to assess the effect of an RRS re-design that aimed to promote use of NTS during RRT calls. The primary outcome was the proportion of admissions each month subject to repeat RRT calling, and the average number of repeat calls per admission each month was the secondary outcome of interest. Univariate and multivariable interrupted time series analyses compared outcomes between the two study phases.
The proportion of admissions with repeat calls each month increased across both phases of the study period, but the increase was lower in the post re-design phase (change in regression slope -0.12 (standard error 0.07) post versus pre re-design). The multivariable model predicted a 6% reduction (95% confidence interval -15.1-3.1; P = 0.19) in the proportion of admissions having repeat calls at the end of the post redesign phase study compared to the predicted proportion in the absence of the re-design. The average number of calls per admission was also predicted to decrease in the post re-design phase, with an estimated difference of -0.07 calls per admission (equivalent to one fewer repeat call per 14 patients who had RRT calls) at the end of the post re-design phase (95% confidence interval -0.23-0.08, P = 0.35).
This study of an RRS re-design showed modest, but not statistically significant, reductions in the proportion of admissions with repeat calls and the mean number of repeat calls per admission. Given the economic and workforce capacity issues that all health care systems now face, even small improvements in the RRS may have lasting impact across the organisation. For the potential interest of RRS managers, this paper presents a pragmatic, low-cost initiative intended to enhance communication and cooperation at RRT calls.
重复快速反应小组(RRT)呼叫与住院死亡率风险增加相关,并对组织层面的资源造成负担。在呼叫中使用非技术技能(NTS)有可能减少潜在可预防的重复呼叫。NTS 通常可以通过培训来提高,尽管这需要时间和财务资源。重新设计快速反应系统(RRS)以促进 NTS 的使用可能是一种可行的替代方案。
进行了一项前后观察性研究,以评估旨在促进 RRT 呼叫中使用 NTS 的 RRS 重新设计的效果。主要结果是每月接受重复 RRT 呼叫的入院人数比例,每月每个入院的平均重复呼叫次数是次要关注的结果。单变量和多变量中断时间序列分析比较了两个研究阶段的结果。
每月重复呼叫的入院人数比例在研究期间的两个阶段都有所增加,但在重新设计后的阶段增加幅度较低(回归斜率变化-0.12(标准误差 0.07)重新设计后与重新设计前)。多变量模型预测,与重新设计不存在的情况下相比,重新设计后阶段结束时,重复呼叫的入院人数比例将降低 6%(95%置信区间-15.1-3.1;P = 0.19)。预计重新设计后阶段每次入院的平均呼叫次数也会减少,估计每次入院减少 0.07 次呼叫(相当于每 14 名接受 RRT 呼叫的患者减少一次重复呼叫)重新设计后阶段结束时(95%置信区间-0.23-0.08,P = 0.35)。
这项对 RRS 重新设计的研究显示,重复呼叫的入院人数比例和每次入院的平均重复呼叫次数都有适度但无统计学意义的降低。考虑到所有医疗保健系统现在面临的经济和劳动力能力问题,RRS 中的微小改进可能会对整个组织产生持久影响。对于 RRS 管理者的潜在兴趣,本文介绍了一项务实、低成本的倡议,旨在增强 RRT 呼叫中的沟通和协作。