文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

保持参与者参与:在荷兰基于互联网的衣原体筛查中,通过自动回复提醒增加参与率。

Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Cluster of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Health Service, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 9;12:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-176.


DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-176
PMID:22404911
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3353245/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of Chlamydia screening programs is determined by an adequate level of participation and the capturing of high-risk groups. This study aimed to evaluate the contribution of automated reminders by letter, email and short message service (SMS) on package request and sample return in an Internet-based Chlamydia screening among people aged 16 to 29 years in the Netherlands. METHODS: Individuals not responding to the invitation letter received a reminder letter after 1 month. Email- and SMS-reminders were sent to persons who did not return their sample. It was examined to what extent reminders enhanced the response rate (% of package requests) and participation rate (% of sample return). Sociodemographic and behavioural correlates of providing a cell phone number and participation after the reminder(s) were studied by logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of all respondents (screening round 1: 52,628, round 2: 41,729), 99% provided an email address and 72% a cell phone number. Forty-two percent of all package requests were made after the reminder letter. The proportion of invitees returning a sample increased significantly from 10% to 14% after email/SMS reminders (round 2: from 7% to 10%). Determinants of providing a cell-phone number were younger age (OR in 25-29 year olds versus 16-19 year olds = 0.8, 95%CI 0.8-0.9), non-Dutch (OR in Surinam/Antillean versus Dutch = 1.3, 95%CI 1.2-1.4, Turkish/Moroccan: 1.1, 95%CI 1.0-1.2, Sub Sahara African: 1.5, 95%CI 1.3-1.8, non-Western other 1.1, 95%CI 1.1-1.2), lower educational level (OR in high educational level versus low level = 0.8, 95%CI 0.7-0.9), no condom use during the last contact with a casual partner (OR no condom use versus condom use 1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.3), younger age at first sexual contact (OR 19 years or older versus younger than 16: 0.7, 95%CI 0.6-0.8). Determinants for requesting a test-package after the reminder letter were male gender (OR female versus male 0.9 95%CI 0.8-0.9), non-Dutch (OR in Surinam/Antillean versus Dutch 1.3, 95%CI 1.2-1.4, Turkish/Moroccan: 1.4, 95%CI 1.3-1.5, Sub Sahara African: 1.4, 95%CI 1.2-1.5, non-Western other: 1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.2), having a long-term steady partnership (long-term versus short-term.1.2 95%CI 1.1-1.3). Email/SMS reminders seem to have resulted in more men and people aged 25-29 years returning a sample. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all respondents (99.5%) were reachable by modern communication media. Response and participation rates increased significantly after the reminders. The reminder letters also seemed to result in reaching more people at risk. Incorporation of automated reminders in Internet-based (Chlamydia) screening programs is strongly recommended.

摘要

背景:衣原体筛查计划的有效性取决于足够的参与水平和高危人群的捕获。本研究旨在评估在荷兰,对年龄在 16 至 29 岁的人群进行的基于互联网的衣原体筛查中,自动信件、电子邮件和短信服务 (SMS) 提醒对套餐请求和样本返回的影响。

方法:未回复邀请函的个人在 1 个月后收到提醒信。对于未返回样本的人员,发送电子邮件和短信提醒。研究了提醒信在多大程度上提高了回复率(套餐请求的百分比)和参与率(样本返回的百分比)。通过逻辑回归模型研究了提供手机号码和提醒后参与的社会人口学和行为相关因素。

结果:在所有受访者(第一轮:52628 人,第二轮:41729 人)中,99%提供了电子邮件地址,72%提供了手机号码。42%的套餐请求是在提醒信之后提出的。在电子邮件/SMS 提醒之后,样本返回的比例从 10%显著增加到 14%(第二轮:从 7%增加到 10%)。提供手机号码的决定因素是年龄较小(25-29 岁年龄组与 16-19 岁年龄组相比,OR = 0.8,95%CI 0.8-0.9)、非荷兰人(苏里南/安的列斯群岛人与荷兰人相比,OR = 1.3,95%CI 1.2-1.4,土耳其/摩洛哥人:1.1,95%CI 1.0-1.2,撒哈拉以南非洲人:1.5,95%CI 1.3-1.8,非西方其他地区:1.1,95%CI 1.1-1.2)、教育程度较低(高教育水平与低教育水平相比,OR = 0.8,95%CI 0.7-0.9)、最近与偶然伴侣发生性行为时未使用安全套(未使用安全套与使用安全套相比,OR = 1.2,95%CI 1.1-1.3)、初次性接触年龄较小(19 岁或以上与小于 16 岁相比,OR = 0.7,95%CI 0.6-0.8)。提醒信后要求测试包的决定因素是男性(女性与男性相比,OR = 0.9,95%CI 0.8-0.9)、非荷兰人(苏里南/安的列斯群岛人与荷兰人相比,OR = 1.3,95%CI 1.2-1.4,土耳其/摩洛哥人:1.4,95%CI 1.3-1.5,撒哈拉以南非洲人:1.4,95%CI 1.2-1.5,非西方其他地区:1.2,95%CI 1.1-1.2)、有长期稳定的伴侣关系(长期与短期相比,OR = 1.2,95%CI 1.1-1.3)。电子邮件/SMS 提醒似乎导致更多的男性和 25-29 岁的人返回样本。

结论:几乎所有的受访者(99.5%)都可以通过现代通信媒体联系到。在提醒信之后,回复率和参与率显著增加。提醒信似乎还可以让更多的高危人群得到样本。强烈建议在基于互联网的(衣原体)筛查计划中纳入自动提醒。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0020/3353245/9f1f879ff929/1471-2458-12-176-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0020/3353245/bfcd7ee3e207/1471-2458-12-176-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0020/3353245/1ad23f1e68af/1471-2458-12-176-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0020/3353245/9f1f879ff929/1471-2458-12-176-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0020/3353245/bfcd7ee3e207/1471-2458-12-176-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0020/3353245/1ad23f1e68af/1471-2458-12-176-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0020/3353245/9f1f879ff929/1471-2458-12-176-3.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.

BMC Public Health. 2012-3-9

[2]
Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.

Sex Transm Dis. 2012-2

[3]
The influence of two different invitation letters on Chlamydia testing participation: randomized controlled trial.

J Med Internet Res. 2014-1-30

[4]
Non-participation in chlamydia screening in The Netherlands: determinants associated with young people's intention to participate in chlamydia screening.

BMC Public Health. 2013-11-23

[5]
Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse.

Sex Transm Dis. 2011-6

[6]
Effectiveness and Acceptability of Targeted Text Message Reminders in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomized Controlled Trial (M-TICS Study).

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024-7-31

[7]
SMS reminders improve re-screening in women and heterosexual men with chlamydia infection at Sydney Sexual Health Centre: a before-and-after study.

Sex Transm Infect. 2012-4-19

[8]
Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation.

BMJ. 2012-7-5

[9]
Effect of Reminding Patients to Complete Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Automated and Live Approaches.

J Gen Intern Med. 2017-10-10

[10]
Telephone call reminders did not increase screening uptake more than SMS reminders: a recruitment study within a trial.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2019-4-30

引用本文的文献

[1]
Pilot implementation of a home-care programme with chlamydia, gonorrhoea, hepatitis B, and syphilis self-sampling in HIV-positive men who have sex with men.

BMC Infect Dis. 2020-12-4

[2]
What Works? Prevention and Control of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Blood-Borne Viruses in Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa, Northeast Asia and Southeast Asia Living in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019-4-10

[3]
Questionnaire Breakoff and Item Nonresponse in Web-Based Questionnaires: Multilevel Analysis of Person-Level and Item Design Factors in a Birth Cohort.

J Med Internet Res. 2018-12-7

[4]
Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017).

BMJ Open. 2017-11-3

[5]
Get Checked… Where? The Development of a Comprehensive, Integrated Internet-Based Testing Program for Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections in British Columbia, Canada.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2016-9-20

[6]
Reducing routine vaccination dropout rates: evaluating two interventions in three Kenyan districts, 2014.

BMC Public Health. 2016-2-16

[7]
Automated alerts and reminders targeting patients: A review of the literature.

Patient Educ Couns. 2016-6

[8]
Acceptance of Home-Based Chlamydia Genital and Anorectal Testing Using Short Message Service (SMS) in Previously Tested Young People and Their Social and Sexual Networks.

PLoS One. 2015-7-31

[9]
Association between recruitment methods and attrition in Internet-based studies.

PLoS One. 2014-12-9

[10]
Young men's views toward the barriers and facilitators of Internet-based Chlamydia trachomatis screening: qualitative study.

J Med Internet Res. 2013-12-3

本文引用的文献

[1]
Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.

Sex Transm Dis. 2012-2

[2]
Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse.

Sex Transm Dis. 2011-6

[3]
"Pee-in-a-Pot": acceptability and uptake of on-site chlamydia screening in a student population in the Republic of Ireland.

BMC Infect Dis. 2010-11-11

[4]
Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, Chlamydia screening implementation programme in the Netherlands.

BMC Infect Dis. 2010-10-7

[5]
Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis: results from the first national population-based survey in France.

Sex Transm Infect. 2010-8

[6]
Home-based chlamydia testing of young people attending a music festival--who will pee and post?

BMC Public Health. 2010-6-28

[7]
Computer reminders for Chlamydia screening in general practice: a randomized controlled trial.

Sex Transm Dis. 2010-7

[8]
Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based, Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008-2010: implications of first results for the analysis.

BMC Infect Dis. 2010-4-7

[9]
Let Them Know: evaluation of an online partner notification service for chlamydia that offers E-mail and SMS messaging.

Sex Transm Dis. 2010-9

[10]
Online-mediated syphilis testing: feasibility, efficacy, and usage.

Sex Transm Dis. 2008-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索