计算机提醒在一般实践中进行衣原体筛查:一项随机对照试验。
Computer reminders for Chlamydia screening in general practice: a randomized controlled trial.
机构信息
University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
出版信息
Sex Transm Dis. 2010 Jul;37(7):445-50. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181cfcb4c.
BACKGROUND
Chlamydia notifications are increasing in Australia, and the use of a computer alert prompting general practitioners to test young women is a potential way to increase opportunistic chlamydia testing. The aim of this trial was to determine the effectiveness of a computer alert in general practice on chlamydia testing in young women.
METHODS
In 2006, clinics (n = 68) in Melbourne, Australia were cluster randomized into 2 groups: the intervention group received a computerized alert advising the general practitioner to discuss chlamydia testing with their patient which popped up when the medical record of a 16- to 24-year-old woman was opened; the control group received no alert. The outcome was whether or not that patient received a chlamydia test at the level of a single consultation with an eligible patient. A mixed effects logistic regression model adjusting for clustering was used to assess the impact of the alert on the proportion of women tested for chlamydia during the trial period.
RESULTS
Testing increased from 8.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.8, 9.8) to 12.2% (95% CI: 9.1, 15.3) (P < 0.01) in the intervention group, and from 8.8% (95% CI: 6.8, 10.7) to 10.6% (95% CI: 8.5, 12.7) (P < 0.01) in the control group. Overall, the intervention group had a 27% (OR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) greater increase in testing.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study suggest that alerts alone may not be sufficient to get chlamydia testing levels up sufficiently high enough to have an impact on the burden of chlamydia in the population but that they could be included as part of a more complex intervention.
背景
澳大利亚的衣原体通报病例不断增加,利用计算机提示促使全科医生对年轻女性进行检测,是增加机会性衣原体检测的一种潜在方法。本试验旨在确定在全科医生实践中使用计算机提示对年轻女性进行衣原体检测的效果。
方法
2006 年,澳大利亚墨尔本的诊所(n=68)被整群随机分为两组:干预组在打开 16-24 岁女性的病历时会弹出计算机化提示,建议全科医生与患者讨论衣原体检测;对照组则不会收到提示。结果是在符合条件的患者单次就诊中,该患者是否接受了衣原体检测。采用混合效应逻辑回归模型对聚类进行调整,以评估提示对试验期间衣原体检测女性比例的影响。
结果
干预组的检测率从 8.3%(95%置信区间(CI):6.8,9.8)增加到 12.2%(95% CI:9.1,15.3)(P<0.01),对照组从 8.8%(95% CI:6.8,10.7)增加到 10.6%(95% CI:8.5,12.7)(P<0.01)。总体而言,干预组的检测率增加了 27%(OR=1.3;95% CI:1.1,1.4)。
结论
本研究结果表明,仅提示可能不足以使衣原体检测率提高到足以对人群中衣原体负担产生影响的水平,但它们可以作为更复杂干预措施的一部分。