• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院外心脏骤停:在响应时间短的大城市紧急医疗服务系统中,目击心脏骤停发作及旁观者心肺复苏的影响

Prehospital cardiac arrest: the impact of witnessed collapse and bystander CPR in a metropolitan EMS system with short response times.

作者信息

Spaite D W, Hanlon T, Criss E A, Valenzuela T D, Wright A L, Keeley K T, Meislin H W

机构信息

Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, Tucson.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Nov;19(11):1264-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82285-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82285-1
PMID:2240722
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Numerous studies have shown initiation of bystander CPR to significantly improve survival from prehospital cardiac arrest. However, in emergency medical services (EMS) systems with very short response times, bystander CPR has not been shown to impact outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of bystander CPR on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in such a system.

DESIGN

Prehospital, hospital, and death certificate data from a medium-sized metropolitan area were retrospectively analyzed for adult, nontraumatic cardiac arrest during a 16-month period.

RESULTS

A total of 298 patients met study criteria. One hundred ninety-five arrests (65.4%) were witnessed, and 103 (34.6%) were unwitnessed. Twenty-five witnessed victims (12.8%) were discharged alive, whereas no unwitnessed victims survived (P less than .001). Patients suffering a witnessed episode of ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (VF/VT) were more likely to survive (21.9%) than were other patients (2.0%, P less than .0001). Among witnessed patients, initiation of bystander CPR was associated with a significant improvement in survival (20.0%) compared with the no-bystander CPR group (9.2%, P less than .05). Bystander CPR was also associated with improved outcome when witnessed patients with successful prehospital resuscitation were evaluated as a group; 18 had bystander CPR, of whom 13 (72.2%) survived compared with only 12 of 38 patients with no bystander CPR (31.6%, P less than .01).

CONCLUSION

Our data revealed improved survival rates when bystander CPR was initiated on victims of witnessed cardiac arrest in an EMS system with short response times.

摘要

目的

大量研究表明,旁观者实施心肺复苏(CPR)能显著提高院外心脏骤停患者的生存率。然而,在响应时间极短的紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统中,旁观者CPR对患者预后并无影响。本研究旨在确定在这样一个系统中,旁观者CPR对院外心脏骤停患者生存的影响。

设计

对一个中等规模大都市地区在16个月期间内成年非创伤性心脏骤停患者的院前、医院及死亡证明数据进行回顾性分析。

结果

共有298例患者符合研究标准。其中195例(65.4%)心脏骤停为有目击者,103例(34.6%)为无目击者。25例有目击者的患者(12.8%)存活出院,而无目击者的患者无一存活(P<0.001)。发生心室颤动/室性心动过速(VF/VT)且有目击者的患者比其他患者更有可能存活(21.9%)(其他患者为2.0%,P<0.0001)。在有目击者的患者中,与无旁观者实施CPR的组相比,旁观者实施CPR与生存率显著提高相关(20.0%)(无旁观者实施CPR组为9.2%,P<0.05)。当将成功进行院前复苏的有目击者患者作为一组进行评估时,旁观者CPR也与更好的预后相关;18例有旁观者实施CPR,其中13例(72.2%)存活,而38例无旁观者实施CPR的患者中只有12例(31.6%)存活(P<0.01)。

结论

我们的数据显示,在响应时间短的EMS系统中,对有目击者的心脏骤停患者实施旁观者CPR可提高生存率。

相似文献

1
Prehospital cardiac arrest: the impact of witnessed collapse and bystander CPR in a metropolitan EMS system with short response times.院外心脏骤停:在响应时间短的大城市紧急医疗服务系统中,目击心脏骤停发作及旁观者心肺复苏的影响
Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Nov;19(11):1264-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82285-1.
2
[Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in an experimental model of the management of cardiologic emergencies in a metropolitan area].[大都市地区心脏急症管理实验模型中的院外心脏骤停]
G Ital Cardiol. 1995 Feb;25(2):127-37.
3
Increased survival after EMS witnessed cardiac arrest. Observations from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Epistry-Cardiac arrest.EMS 目击心脏骤停后生存率提高。复苏结果联盟(ROC)Epistry-心脏骤停的观察结果。
Resuscitation. 2010 Jul;81(7):826-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
4
Results of the first five years of the prehospital automatic external defibrillation project in Singapore in the "Utstein style".新加坡院前自动体外除颤项目头五年采用“乌斯坦模式”的结果。
Resuscitation. 2005 Jan;64(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.06.020.
5
CPR-only survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: implications for out-of-hospital care and cardiac arrest research methodology.院外心脏骤停仅接受心肺复苏术的幸存者:对院外护理和心脏骤停研究方法的启示
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jun;37(6):602-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.114302.
6
Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration on survival from paramedic witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: An observational study.急救员目击院外心脏骤停患者心肺复苏持续时间对生存率的影响:一项观察性研究。
Resuscitation. 2016 Mar;100:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.011. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
7
The three-phase model of cardiac arrest as applied to ventricular fibrillation in a large, urban emergency medical services system.应用于大型城市紧急医疗服务系统中心室颤动的心脏骤停三相模型。
Resuscitation. 2005 Mar;64(3):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.09.011.
8
EMT defibrillation does not increase survival from sudden cardiac death in a two-tiered urban-suburban EMS system.在一个城乡两级急救医疗服务(EMS)系统中,急诊医疗服务(EMT)除颤并不能提高心源性猝死的生存率。
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;31(2):234-40. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70313-0.
9
Inter-rater reliability for witnessed collapse and presence of bystander CPR.目击者证实的心脏骤停及旁观者实施心肺复苏的评分者间信度。
Resuscitation. 2006 Sep;70(3):410-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.12.015. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
10
Out-of-hospital unwitnessed cardiopulmonary collapse and no-bystander CPR: a practical addition to resuscitation termination guidelines.院外非目击心搏呼吸骤停且无旁观者实施心肺复苏:复苏终止指南的一项实用补充内容
J Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of Prognostic Factors in a Large Cohort of In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients.一大群住院和院外心脏骤停患者预后因素的比较
Life (Basel). 2024 Mar 18;14(3):403. doi: 10.3390/life14030403.
2
Prehospital extremity tourniquet placements-performance evaluation of non-EMS placement of a lifesaving device.院前四肢止血带放置——救命装置的非 EMS 放置的性能评估。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):4255-4265. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01973-4. Epub 2022 May 10.
3
Nifekalant versus Amiodarone for Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Refractory Shockable Rhythms; a Post Hoc Analysis.
尼非卡兰与胺碘酮用于院外心脏骤停伴顽固性可电击心律的比较;一项事后分析
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 1;10(1):e6. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1425. eCollection 2022.
4
Outcomes following cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an emergency department of a low- and middle-income country.中低收入国家急诊科心肺复苏后的结果
Int J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 1;11(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12245-018-0200-0.
5
Bystander Intervention Prior to The Arrival of Emergency Medical Services: Comparing Assistance across Types of Medical Emergencies.紧急医疗服务到达之前的旁观者干预:比较不同类型医疗紧急情况中的援助情况。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 May-Jun;20(3):317-23. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1088605. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
6
Year in review 2011: Critical Care--Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and trauma.2011年回顾:重症监护——院外心脏骤停与创伤
Crit Care. 2012 Dec 10;16(6):247. doi: 10.1186/cc11832.
7
[Analysis of care in cardiorespiratory arrest in an emergency medical unit].[急诊医疗单元心肺骤停护理分析]
Aten Primaria. 2011 Jul;43(7):369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2010.06.007. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
8
Variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation and transport practices in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium: ROC Epistry-Cardiac Arrest.复苏结局联盟中院外心脏骤停复苏和转运实践的差异:ROC Epistry-Cardiac Arrest。
Resuscitation. 2011 Mar;82(3):277-84. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.10.022. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
9
Increased survival after EMS witnessed cardiac arrest. Observations from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Epistry-Cardiac arrest.EMS 目击心脏骤停后生存率提高。复苏结果联盟(ROC)Epistry-心脏骤停的观察结果。
Resuscitation. 2010 Jul;81(7):826-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
10
Can we define patients with no chance of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?我们能否界定院外心脏骤停后没有存活机会的患者?
Heart. 2004 Oct;90(10):1114-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.029348.