Suppr超能文献

支气管激发试验前后静息状态二氧化碳分压在哮喘患者和非哮喘患者中的变化。

Resting and post bronchial challenge testing carbon dioxide partial pressure in individuals with and without asthma.

机构信息

Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032464. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is conflicting evidence about resting carbon dioxide levels in asthmatic individuals. We wanted to determine if transcutaneously measured carbon dioxide levels prior and during bronchial provocation testing differ according to asthma status reflecting dysfunctional breathing.

METHODS

We investigated active firefighters and policemen by means of a validated questionnaire on respiratory symptoms, spirometry, bronchial challenge testing with methacholine (MCT) and measurement of transcutaneous blood carbon dioxide partial pressure (PtcCO(2)) at rest prior performing spirometry, one minute and five minutes after termination of MCT. A respiratory physician blinded to the PtcCO(2) results assigned a diagnosis of asthma after reviewing the available study data and the files of the workers medical screening program.

RESULTS

The study sample consisted of 128 male and 10 female individuals. Fifteen individuals (11%) had physician-diagnosed asthma. There was no clinically important difference in median PtcCO(2) at rest, one and five minutes after recovery from MCT in asthmatics compared to non-asthmatics (35.6 vs 35.7 mmHg, p = 0.466; 34.7 vs 33.4 mmHg, p = 0.245 and 37.4 vs 36.4 mmHg, p = 0.732). The median drop in PtcCO(2) during MCT and the increase after MCT was lower in asthmatics compared to non-asthmatics (0.1 vs 3.2 mmHg, p = 0.014 and 1.9 vs 2.9 mmHg, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

PtcCO(2) levels at rest prior and during recovery after MCT do not differ in individuals with or without physician diagnosed asthma. The fall and subsequent increase in PtcCO(2) levels are higher in non-asthmatics than in asthmatics and seems to be related with increased number of respiratory maneuvers during MCT.

摘要

目的

关于哮喘患者的静息二氧化碳水平,存在相互矛盾的证据。我们想确定在支气管激发试验前和期间经皮测量的二氧化碳水平是否因反映呼吸功能障碍的哮喘状态而不同。

方法

我们通过一份关于呼吸症状的经过验证的问卷,对现役消防员和警察进行了调查,同时进行了支气管激发试验(用乙酰甲胆碱进行)和经皮血二氧化碳分压(PtcCO2)的测量(在进行肺活量测定之前、乙酰甲胆碱结束后 1 分钟和 5 分钟)。一位对 PtcCO2 结果不知情的呼吸科医生在查看了可用的研究数据和工人医疗筛查计划的档案后,给出了哮喘的诊断。

结果

研究样本包括 128 名男性和 10 名女性。15 人(11%)被医生诊断为哮喘。与非哮喘者相比,哮喘者在静息、乙酰甲胆碱恢复后 1 分钟和 5 分钟时的 PtcCO2 中位数无显著差异(35.6 与 35.7mmHg,p=0.466;34.7 与 33.4mmHg,p=0.245;37.4 与 36.4mmHg,p=0.732)。哮喘者乙酰甲胆碱激发试验过程中的 PtcCO2 下降量和激发后增加量均低于非哮喘者(0.1 与 3.2mmHg,p=0.014;1.9 与 2.9mmHg,p=0.025)。

结论

在有或没有医生诊断为哮喘的个体中,在进行乙酰甲胆碱激发试验前和恢复期间,PtcCO2 水平没有差异。非哮喘者的 PtcCO2 下降量和随后的增加量均高于哮喘者,这似乎与乙酰甲胆碱激发试验期间呼吸动作次数的增加有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7c/3296724/5992dd5128c9/pone.0032464.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验