Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Nucl Med. 2012 Apr;53(4):615-21. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.096453. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
Bone marrow is usually dose-limiting for radioimmunotherapy. In this study, we directly estimated red marrow activity concentration and the self-dose component of absorbed radiation dose to red marrow based on PET/CT of 2 different (124)I-labeled antibodies (cG250 and huA33) and compared the results with plasma activity concentration and plasma-based dose estimates.
Two groups of patients injected with (124)I-labeled monoclonal antibodies (11 patients with renal cancer receiving (124)I-cG250 and 5 patients with colorectal cancer receiving (124)I- huA33) were imaged by PET or PET/CT on 2 or 3 occasions after infusion. Regions of interest were drawn over several lumbar vertebrae, and red marrow activity concentration was quantified. Plasma activity concentration was also quantified using multiple patient blood samples. The red marrow-to-plasma activity concentration ratio (RMPR) was calculated at the times of imaging. The self-dose component of the absorbed radiation dose to the red marrow was estimated from the images, from the plasma measurements, and using a combination of both sets of measurements.
RMPR was observed to increase with time for both groups of patients. Mean (±SD) time-dependent RMPR (RMPR(t)) for the cG250 group increased from 0.13 ± 0.06 immediately after infusion to 0.23 ± 0.09 at approximately 6 d after infusion. For the huA33 group, mean RMPR(t) was 0.10 ± 0.04 immediately after infusion, 0.13 ± 0.05 approximately 2 d after infusion, and 0.20 ± 0.09 approximately 7 d after infusion. Plasma-based estimates of red marrow self-dose tended to be greater than image-based values by, on average, 11% and 47% for cG250 and huA33, respectively, but by as much as -73% to 62% for individual patients. The hybrid method combining RMPR(t) and plasma activity concentration provided a closer match to the image-based dose estimates (average discrepancies, -2% and 18% for cG250 and huA33, respectively).
These results suggest that the assumption of time-independent proportionality between red marrow and plasma activity concentration may be too simplistic. Individualized imaged-based dosimetry is probably required for the optimal therapeutic delivery of radiolabeled antibodies, which does not compromise red marrow and may allow, for some patients, a substantial increase in administered activity and thus tumor dose.
基于 PET/CT 直接估计放射性免疫治疗中红骨髓的活性浓度和吸收剂量的自剂量成分,并比较两种不同(124)I 标记抗体(cG250 和 huA33)的结果与血浆活性浓度和基于血浆的剂量估算值。
两组接受(124)I 标记单克隆抗体(11 例肾细胞癌患者接受(124)I-cG250,5 例结直肠癌患者接受(124)I-huA33)的患者,在输注后 2 或 3 次进行 PET 或 PET/CT 成像。在几个腰椎上绘制感兴趣区域,并量化红骨髓的活性浓度。还使用多个患者的血液样本定量测定血浆活性浓度。在成像时计算红骨髓与血浆的活性浓度比(RMPR)。从图像、从血浆测量值以及使用两组测量值的组合来估计红骨髓吸收剂量的自剂量成分。
两组患者的 RMPR 均随时间增加。cG250 组的平均(±SD)时间依赖性 RMPR(RMPR(t))在输注后立即从 0.13 ± 0.06 增加到大约 6 天后的 0.23 ± 0.09。huA33 组,RMPR(t)的平均水平在输注后立即为 0.10 ± 0.04,大约 2 天后为 0.13 ± 0.05,大约 7 天后为 0.20 ± 0.09。基于血浆的红骨髓自剂量估计值平均比图像值高 11%和 47%,分别用于 cG250 和 huA33,但对于个别患者,差异高达-73%至 62%。结合 RMPR(t)和血浆活性浓度的混合方法与基于图像的剂量估算值更吻合(分别为 cG250 和 huA33 的平均差异为-2%和 18%)。
这些结果表明,红骨髓与血浆活性浓度之间时间独立比例的假设可能过于简单。个体化基于图像的剂量测定可能是放射性标记抗体最佳治疗的最佳方法,不会损害红骨髓,并且可能允许一些患者大量增加给予的活性,从而增加肿瘤剂量。