Suppr超能文献

用于肾脏疾病的治疗性血液成分分离术。

Therapeutic apheresis for renal disorders.

作者信息

Sanchez Amber P, Ward David M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of California, and Therapeutic Apheresis Program, UCSD Medical Center, San Diego, California 92103-8781, USA.

出版信息

Semin Dial. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):119-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.01022.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

Abstract

This review summarizes the clinical evidence and practical details for the use of plasmapheresis and other apheresis modalities for each indication in nephrology. Updated information on the molecular biology and immunology of each renal disease is discussed in relation to the rationale for apheresis therapy and its place amid other available treatments. Autoantibody-mediated diseases, such as anti-GBM (anti-glomerular basement membrane) glomerulonephritis (GN), ANCA (antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody)-related GN and the antibody-mediated type of TTP (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura), and alloantibody-mediated diseases such as kidney transplant sensitization and humoral rejection, can be treated by various plasmapheresis methods. These include standard plasmapheresis with a replacement volume, or plasmapheresis with online plasma purification using adsorption columns or secondary filtration. However, it should be noted that the pathogenic molecules implicated in FSGS (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis), myeloma cast nephropathy, and perhaps other diseases are too small to be removed by most online purification methods. A great majority of controlled trials and series on which evidence-based treatment recommendations are made were performed using centrifugal plasmapheresis; it is presumed that membrane-separation plasmapheresis is equally efficacious. For some rarer diseases, such as MPGN (membranoproliferative GN) type 2 with factor H abnormalities or C3Nef (C3 nephritic factor) autoantibodies, there are only a few case reports, but enough scientific understanding to warrant a trial of plasmapheresis in severe cases. Photopheresis, which is effective for cell-mediated rejection in heart and lung transplantation, has not yet found a place in the routine treatment of kidney transplant rejection.

摘要

本综述总结了在肾脏病学中针对每种适应症使用血浆置换及其他血液分离方式的临床证据和实践细节。结合血液分离治疗的原理及其在其他可用治疗手段中的地位,讨论了每种肾脏疾病分子生物学和免疫学的最新信息。自身抗体介导的疾病,如抗肾小球基底膜(anti-GBM)肾小球肾炎(GN)、抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关GN以及抗体介导型血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(TTP),和同种抗体介导的疾病,如肾移植致敏和体液排斥,可通过多种血浆置换方法进行治疗。这些方法包括具有置换量的标准血浆置换,或使用吸附柱或二次过滤进行在线血浆净化的血浆置换。然而,应注意的是,局灶节段性肾小球硬化(FSGS)、骨髓瘤管型肾病以及其他可能疾病中涉及的致病分子太小,无法通过大多数在线净化方法清除。大多数基于证据的治疗建议所依据的对照试验和系列研究是使用离心式血浆置换进行的;据推测,膜分离血浆置换同样有效。对于一些罕见疾病,如伴有补体因子H异常或C3肾炎因子(C3Nef)自身抗体的2型膜增生性肾小球肾炎(MPGN),仅有少数病例报告,但有足够的科学认识支持在重症病例中试用血浆置换。光分离置换疗法对心肺移植中的细胞介导排斥有效,但尚未在肾移植排斥的常规治疗中得到应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验