Leavitt Partners, Salt Lake City, UT 84111, USA.
J Food Sci. 2012 Apr;77(4):R111-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02630.x. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
Effective food safety and food defense risk communication helps to inform consumers without causing panic and alarm. The Risk Communication Team of the Natl. Center for Food Protection and Defense has developed a list of 11 best practices recommended for effective risk communication. These practices, designed for a food defense crisis, are currently applied to food safety issues, since fortunately a food defense crisis has yet to occur. IFT examined the utility of these best practices and the limitations on their use during food safety and food defense crises by academics, trade associations, and the government. It was hypothesized that legal and business considerations as well as the nature of the event would determine the implementation of the best practices. Through the use of focus group meetings, it was discovered that there was a low level of awareness of the best practices. However, stakeholders practiced some aspects of the recommended practices. Participants felt some of the practices were related and could be consolidated. They also agreed that a food defense event will increase the urgency of the communication and include players not typically involved in food safety issues. The challenges reported by the stakeholders varied, but legal liability, as well as the impact their communications could have on an industry, were often cited. From the government perspective, their need to act within their authorities drove some of their actions with respect to communication. Determining the differences in communication limitations during food safety against food defense events can provide key information to further developing and refining risk communications and specific messages targeted for a food defense incident.
Effective food safety and food defense risk communication helps to inform consumers without causing panic and alarm. Determining the differences in communication limitations during food safety against food defense events can provide key information to further developing and refining risk communications and specific messages targeted for a food defense incident.
有效的食品安全和食品防御风险沟通有助于在不引起恐慌和警报的情况下告知消费者。国家食品安全与防御中心的风险沟通小组制定了 11 项最佳实践建议,以进行有效的风险沟通。这些实践最初是为食品防御危机设计的,目前也应用于食品安全问题,因为幸运的是,食品防御危机尚未发生。IFT 检查了这些最佳实践在食品安全和食品防御危机期间的学术、贸易协会和政府使用的实用性及其使用的局限性。假设法律和商业考虑因素以及事件的性质将决定最佳实践的实施。通过使用焦点小组会议,发现对最佳实践的认识水平较低。然而,利益相关者确实实践了一些建议实践的某些方面。参与者认为其中一些实践是相关的,可以进行整合。他们还同意,食品防御事件将增加沟通的紧迫性,并包括通常不参与食品安全问题的参与者。利益相关者报告的挑战各不相同,但法律责任以及他们的沟通可能对行业产生的影响经常被提及。从政府的角度来看,他们需要在其职权范围内采取行动,这推动了他们在沟通方面的一些行动。确定食品安全与食品防御事件期间沟通限制的差异,可以为进一步开发和完善风险沟通以及针对食品防御事件的特定信息提供关键信息。
有效的食品安全和食品防御风险沟通有助于在不引起恐慌和警报的情况下告知消费者。确定食品安全与食品防御事件期间沟通限制的差异,可以为进一步开发和完善风险沟通以及针对食品防御事件的特定信息提供关键信息。