Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Resuscitation. 2012 Nov;83(11):1363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
We investigated which factors are associated with successful paediatric endotracheal intubation (ETI) on the first attempt in emergency department (EDs) from multicentre emergency airway registry data.
We created a multicentre registry of intubations at 13 EDs and performed surveillance over 5 years. Each intubator filled out a data form after an intubation. We defined "paediatric patients" as patients younger than 10 years of age. We assessed the specialty and level of training of intubator, the method, the equipment, and the associated adverse events. We analysed the intubation success rates on the first attempt (first-pass success, FPS) based on these variables.
A total of 430 ETIs were performed on 281 children seen in the ED. The overall FPS rate was 67.6%, but emergency medicine (EM) physicians showed a significantly greater success rate of 74.4%. In the logistic regression analysis, the intubator's specialty was the only independent predictive factor for paediatric FPS. In the subgroup analysis, the EM physicians used the rapid sequence intubation/intubation (RSI) method and Macintosh laryngoscope more frequently than physicians of other specialties. ETI-related adverse events occurred in 21 (7.2%) out of the 281 cases. The most common adverse event in the FPS group was mainstem bronchus intubation, and vomiting was the most common event in the non-FPS group. The incidence of adverse events was lower in the FPS group than in the non-FPS group, but this difference was not statistically significant.
The intubator's specialty was the major factor associated with FPS in emergency department paediatric ETI, The overall ETI FPS rate among paediatric patients was 67.6%, but the EM physicians had a FPS rate of 74.4%. A well structured airway skill training program, and more actively using the RSI method are important and this could explain this differences.
我们从多中心急诊气道注册数据中调查了哪些因素与急诊(ED)中首次尝试儿科气管插管(ETI)的成功相关。
我们在 13 个 ED 建立了一个多中心插管登记处,并进行了 5 年的监测。每个插管者在插管后填写一份数据表格。我们将“儿科患者”定义为年龄小于 10 岁的患者。我们评估了插管者的专业和培训水平、方法、设备和相关不良事件。我们根据这些变量分析了首次尝试的插管成功率(首次通过成功率,FPS)。
在 ED 就诊的 281 名儿童中,共进行了 430 次 ETI。整体 FPS 率为 67.6%,但急诊医学(EM)医生的成功率明显更高,为 74.4%。在逻辑回归分析中,插管者的专业是儿科 FPS 的唯一独立预测因素。在亚组分析中,EM 医生比其他专业的医生更频繁地使用快速序列插管/插管(RSI)方法和 Macintosh 喉镜。在 281 例病例中,有 21 例(7.2%)发生了与 ETI 相关的不良事件。FPS 组中最常见的不良事件是主支气管插管,而非 FPS 组中最常见的不良事件是呕吐。FPS 组的不良事件发生率低于非 FPS 组,但差异无统计学意义。
在急诊儿科 ETI 中,插管者的专业是与 FPS 相关的主要因素,儿科患者的整体 ETI FPS 率为 67.6%,但 EM 医生的 FPS 率为 74.4%。一个结构良好的气道技能培训计划,以及更积极地使用 RSI 方法是重要的,这可以解释这种差异。