Suppr超能文献

用于急性护理期间接受老年评估的老年人的“在线”老年评估程序,用于考虑分诊决策的可靠性。

'Online' geriatric assessment procedure for older adults referred for geriatric assessment during an acute care episode for consideration of reliability of triage decisions.

机构信息

Centre for Research in Geriatric Medicine, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2012 Mar 20;12:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive geriatric assessment has been shown to improve patient outcomes, but the geriatricians who deliver it are in short-supply. A web-based method of comprehensive geriatric assessment has been developed with the potential to improve access to specialist geriatric expertise. The current study aims to test the reliability and safety of comprehensive geriatric assessment performed "online" in making geriatric triage decisions. It will also explore the accuracy of the procedure in identifying common geriatric syndromes, and its cost relative to conventional "live" consultations.

METHODS/DESIGN: The study population will consist of 270 acutely hospitalized patients referred for geriatric consultation at three sites. Paired assessments (live and online) will be conducted by independent, blinded geriatricians and the level of agreement examined. This will be compared with the level of agreement between two independent, blinded geriatricians each consulting with the patient in person (i.e. "live"). Agreement between the triage decision from live-live assessments and between the triage decision from live-online assessments will be calculated using kappa statistics. Agreement between the online and live detection of common geriatric syndromes will also be assessed using kappa statistics. Resource use data will be collected for online and live-live assessments to allow comparison between the two procedures.

DISCUSSION

If the online approach is found to be less precise than live assessment, further analysis will seek to identify patient subgroups where disagreement is more likely. This may enable a protocol to be developed that avoids unsafe clinical decisions at a distance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12611000936921.

摘要

背景

综合老年评估已被证明可以改善患者的预后,但提供这种评估的老年医生却供不应求。已经开发出一种基于网络的综合老年评估方法,有可能改善获得专科老年专业知识的途径。目前的研究旨在测试在线进行综合老年评估在进行老年分诊决策时的可靠性和安全性。它还将探讨该程序在识别常见老年综合征方面的准确性,以及其相对于传统“现场”咨询的成本。

方法/设计:研究人群将包括在三个地点接受老年咨询的 270 名急性住院患者。由独立的、盲目的老年医生进行配对评估(现场和在线),并检查一致性。将其与两位独立的、盲目的老年医生各自与患者进行现场咨询(即“现场”)的一致性进行比较。使用 Kappa 统计计算现场-现场评估的分诊决策之间以及现场-在线评估的分诊决策之间的一致性。使用 Kappa 统计评估在线和现场检测常见老年综合征的一致性。将收集在线和现场-现场评估的资源使用数据,以便对两种程序进行比较。

讨论

如果发现在线方法的准确性低于现场评估,进一步的分析将试图确定更有可能出现不一致的患者亚组。这可能使我们能够制定一种协议,避免在远程做出不安全的临床决策。

临床试验注册号

ACTRN12611000936921。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652a/3325873/db92e737e1e7/1471-2318-12-10-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验