Suppr超能文献

老年患者急诊筛查、分诊紧急程度与 30 天死亡率

Geriatric Screening, Triage Urgency, and 30-Day Mortality in Older Emergency Department Patients.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Section Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1755-1762. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16427. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urgency triage in the emergency department (ED) is important for early identification of potentially lethal conditions and extensive resource utilization. However, in older patients, urgency triage systems could be improved by taking geriatric vulnerability into account. We investigated the association of geriatric vulnerability screening in addition to triage urgency levels with 30-day mortality in older ED patients.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the observational multicenter Acutely Presenting Older Patient (APOP) study.

SETTING

EDs within four Dutch hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients, aged 70 years or older, who were prospectively included.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients were triaged using the Manchester Triage System (MTS). In addition, the APOP screener was used as a geriatric screening tool. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Comparison was made between mortality within the geriatric high- and low-risk screened patients in every urgency triage category. We calculated the difference in explained variance of mortality by adding the geriatric screener (APOP) to triage urgency (MTS) by calculating Nagelkerke R .

RESULTS

We included 2,608 patients with a median age of 79 (interquartile range = 74-84) years, of whom 521 (20.0%) patients were categorized as high risk according to geriatric screening. Patients were triaged on urgency as standard (27.2%), urgent (58.5%), and very urgent (14.3%). In total, 132 (5.1%) patients were deceased within a period of 30 days. Within every urgency triage category, 30-day mortality was threefold higher in geriatric high-risk compared to low-risk patients (overall = 11.7% vs 3.4%; P < .001). The explained variance of 30-day mortality with triage urgency was 1.0% and increased to 6.3% by adding the geriatric screener.

CONCLUSION

Combining triage urgency with geriatric screening has the potential to improve triage, which may help clinicians to deliver early appropriate care to older ED patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1755-1762, 2020.

摘要

背景

在急诊科(ED)进行紧急分诊对于早期识别潜在致命情况和广泛利用资源非常重要。然而,在老年患者中,通过考虑老年脆弱性,可以改进紧急分诊系统。我们研究了在对老年 ED 患者进行 30 天死亡率进行评估时,除了分诊紧急程度之外,进行老年脆弱性筛查的相关性。

设计

观察性多中心 Acutely Presenting Older Patient(APOP)研究的二次分析。

地点

荷兰四家医院的 ED。

参与者

连续纳入的 70 岁或以上的前瞻性患者。

测量

使用曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)对患者进行分诊。此外,还使用 APOP 筛查器作为老年筛查工具。主要结局是 30 天死亡率。比较了每个分诊紧急类别中在老年高风险和低风险筛查患者中的死亡率差异。我们通过计算 Nagelkerke R 来比较通过增加分诊(MTS)紧急程度来解释死亡率差异的差异,计算方法是将老年筛查器(APOP)添加到分诊紧急程度中。

结果

我们纳入了 2608 名中位年龄为 79 岁(四分位间距=74-84 岁)的患者,其中 521 名(20.0%)患者根据老年筛查被归类为高风险。患者根据标准(27.2%)、紧急(58.5%)和非常紧急(14.3%)进行分诊。在整个研究期间,有 132 名(5.1%)患者在 30 天内死亡。在每个分诊紧急类别中,老年高风险患者的 30 天死亡率是低风险患者的三倍(总体为 11.7%比 3.4%;P<0.001)。分诊紧急程度对 30 天死亡率的解释方差为 1.0%,通过增加老年筛查器,解释方差增加到 6.3%。

结论

将分诊紧急程度与老年筛查相结合,有可能改善分诊,从而帮助临床医生为老年 ED 患者提供早期适当的护理。美国老年医学会 68:1755-1762, 2020。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad68/7497167/ec2dd578ffe1/JGS-68-1755-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验