Chen S C, Lin Z Y, Lu S N, Chuang W L, Hsieh M Y, Wang L Y, Tsai J F, Chang W Y
Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical College, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi. 1990 Oct;6(10):551-5.
Effects of hemostatic and various side effects were compared between glypressin and pitressin. Fifty-five episodes of esophageal variceal bleeding in 29 patients were studied. Although the glypressin group included more patients in Pugh's classification C than the pitressin group, the result of hemostasis was not influenced. The effect of hemostasis was evaluated in 24 episodes receiving either glypressin or pitressin. The hemostatic effects of glypressin and pitressin were 6/11, 54.5% and 7/13, 53.8% respectively. Eighteen episodes in six patients, with multiple episodes, were used to observe the effect of these two drugs in the same person. No difference was observed. The number of side effects in the glypressin group and the pitressin group were 5 and 10 respectively. Although the side effects of glypressin might be fewer than those of pitressin, chest pain was observed in patients receiving glypressin treatment. The use of glypressin in the patients with cardiac diseases should be studied further. Glypressin is more convenient in clinical use. However, pitressin doses is easily modified. Both drugs might be selected in the control of variceal bleeding.
对加压素和垂体后叶素的止血效果及各种副作用进行了比较。研究了29例患者的55次食管静脉曲张出血发作情况。尽管加压素组中处于Pugh分级C级的患者比垂体后叶素组更多,但止血结果并未受到影响。对接受加压素或垂体后叶素治疗的24次发作进行了止血效果评估。加压素和垂体后叶素的止血效果分别为6/11(54.5%)和7/13(53.8%)。对6例有多次发作的患者的18次发作进行观察,以了解这两种药物在同一患者身上的效果。未观察到差异。加压素组和垂体后叶素组的副作用数量分别为5例和10例。尽管加压素的副作用可能比垂体后叶素少,但接受加压素治疗的患者出现了胸痛。心脏病患者使用加压素的情况应进一步研究。加压素在临床使用中更方便。然而,垂体后叶素的剂量易于调整。在控制静脉曲张出血时,两种药物均可选用。