• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过医疗之家模式转变初级保健以降低长期成本:来自 Geisinger 的证据。

Reducing long-term cost by transforming primary care: evidence from Geisinger's medical home model.

机构信息

Geisinger Center for Health Research, Danville, PA 17822, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2012 Mar;18(3):149-55.

PMID:22435908
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate cost savings associated with ProvenHealth Navigator (PHN), which is an advanced model of patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) developed by Geisinger Health System, and determine whether those savings increase over time.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective claims data analysis of 43 primary care clinics that were converted into PHN sites between 2006 and 2010. The study population included Geisinger Health Plan's Medicare Advantage plan enrollees who were 65 years or older treated in these clinics (26,303 unique members).

METHODS

Two patient-level multivariate regression models (with and without interaction effects between prescription drug coverage and PHN exposure) with member fixed effects were used to estimate the effect of members' exposure to PHN on per-member per-month total cost, controlling for member risk, seasonality, yearly trend, and a set of baseline clinic characteristics.

RESULTS

In both models, a longer period of PHN exposure was significantly associated with a lower total cost. The total cumulative cost savings over the study period was 7.1% (95% confi dence interval [CI] 2.6-11.6) using the model with the prescription drug coverage interaction effects and 4.3% (95% CI 0.4-8.3) using the model without the interaction effects. Corresponding return on investment was 1.7 (95% CI 0.3-3.0) and 1.0 (95% Cl -0.1 to 2.0), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding suggests that PCMHs can lead to significant and sustainable cost savings over time.

摘要

目的

估算与 ProvenHealth Navigator(PHN)相关的成本节约,PHN 是由 Geisinger 健康系统开发的一种以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)的先进模式,并确定这些节约是否随着时间的推移而增加。

研究设计

对 2006 年至 2010 年间转换为 PHN 地点的 43 个初级保健诊所的回顾性索赔数据分析。研究人群包括 Geisinger 健康计划的 Medicare Advantage 计划的 65 岁及以上的参保人,他们在这些诊所接受治疗(26303 名独特的成员)。

方法

使用具有成员固定效应的两个患者水平多元回归模型(具有和不具有处方药覆盖范围与 PHN 暴露之间的交互效应),来估计成员接触 PHN 对每个成员每月总费用的影响,控制成员风险、季节性、年度趋势和一组基线诊所特征。

结果

在两个模型中,较长时间的 PHN 暴露与较低的总费用显著相关。使用具有处方药覆盖范围交互效应的模型,研究期间的总累计成本节约为 7.1%(95%置信区间[CI]2.6-11.6),而使用没有交互效应的模型则为 4.3%(95%CI0.4-8.3)。相应的投资回报率分别为 1.7(95%CI0.3-3.0)和 1.0(95%CI-0.1-2.0)。

结论

我们的发现表明,随着时间的推移,PCMH 可以带来显著和可持续的成本节约。

相似文献

1
Reducing long-term cost by transforming primary care: evidence from Geisinger's medical home model.通过医疗之家模式转变初级保健以降低长期成本:来自 Geisinger 的证据。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Mar;18(3):149-55.
2
Can a patient-centered medical home lead to better patient outcomes? The quality implications of Geisinger's ProvenHealth Navigator.以患者为中心的医疗之家能否带来更好的患者治疗效果?盖辛格健康导航计划的质量影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):210-6. doi: 10.1177/1062860611417421. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
3
Improving patient experience by transforming primary care: evidence from Geisinger's patient-centered medical homes.通过转变基层医疗来改善患者体验:来自盖辛格患者为中心医疗之家的证据。
Popul Health Manag. 2013 Jun;16(3):157-63. doi: 10.1089/pop.2012.0048. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
4
Reduced acute inpatient care was largest savings component of Geisinger Health System's patient-centered medical home.减少急性住院护理是盖辛格医疗系统以患者为中心的医疗之家最大的节省成本组成部分。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Apr;34(4):636-44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0855.
5
Value of primary care diabetes management: long-term cost impacts.初级保健糖尿病管理的价值:长期成本影响
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Mar 1;22(3):e88-94.
6
Medicaid Managed Care in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Lessons from Geisinger's Early Experience.综合医疗服务体系中的医疗补助管理式医疗:盖辛格早期经验的教训
Popul Health Manag. 2016 Aug;19(4):257-63. doi: 10.1089/pop.2015.0079. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
7
The value of value-based insurance design: savings from eliminating drug co-payments.基于价值的保险设计的价值:消除药品自付费用带来的节省。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Feb;22(2):116-21.
8
Value and the medical home: effects of transformed primary care.价值与医疗之家:转化后的初级保健的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Aug;16(8):607-14.
9
Can health insurance improve employee health outcome and reduce cost? An evaluation of Geisinger's employee health and wellness program.医疗保险能否改善员工的健康状况并降低成本?对 Geisinger 员工健康与健康计划的评估。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Nov;55(11):1271-5. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000009.
10
The estimated costs and savings of medical nutrition therapy: the Medicare population.医学营养治疗的估计成本与节省费用:医疗保险人群
J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Apr;99(4):428-35. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00105-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Health Technologies in Multicomponent Primary Care Interventions: Systematic Review.健康技术在多组分初级保健干预中的作用:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e20195. doi: 10.2196/20195.
2
Multicomponent interventions for enhancing primary care: a systematic review.多组分干预措施增强初级保健:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec 28;71(702):e10-e21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X714199. Print 2021 Jan.
3
Impact of Healthcare Delivery System Type on Clinical, Utilization, and Cost Outcomes of Patient-Centered Medical Homes: a Systematic Review.
医疗服务提供系统类型对以患者为中心的医疗之家的临床、利用和成本结果的影响:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1276-1284. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05594-3. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
4
The effectiveness of patient-centred medical home model versus standard primary care in chronic disease management: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials.以患者为中心的医疗之家模式与标准初级保健在慢性病管理方面的效果比较:系统评价和随机对照及非随机对照试验的荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 29;7(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0887-2.
5
Community Health Workers Bring Cost Savings to Patient-Centered Medical Homes.社区卫生工作者为以患者为中心的医疗之家带来成本节约。
J Community Health. 2018 Feb;43(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0403-y.
6
Effects of New Funding Models for Patient-Centered Medical Homes on Primary Care Practice Finances and Services: Results of a Microsimulation Model.以患者为中心的医疗之家新资助模式对初级保健实践财务和服务的影响:微观模拟模型的结果
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Sep;14(5):404-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1960.
7
The impact of a regional patient-centered medical home initiative on cost of care among commercially insured population in the US.美国一项以患者为中心的区域医疗之家倡议对商业保险人群医疗费用的影响。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2016 May 26;9:67-74. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S102826. eCollection 2016.
8
Evaluating the Impact of Parent-Reported Medical Home Status on Children's Health Care Utilization, Expenditures, and Quality: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis with Causal Inference Methods.评估家长报告的医疗之家状况对儿童医疗保健利用、支出和质量的影响:采用因果推断方法的双重差分分析。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr;52(2):786-806. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12512. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
9
Improving primary care: Continuity is about relationships.改善基层医疗服务:连续性关乎医患关系。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Feb;62(2):116-9, e57-60.
10
Investigation of comparative effectiveness research in Asia, Europe, and North America.亚洲、欧洲和北美的比较效果研究调查。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2015 Nov-Dec;47(6):585-93. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.169592.