Suppr超能文献

区分肠促胰岛素治疗:2 型糖尿病的多靶点方法。

Differentiating among incretin therapies: a multiple-target approach to type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Chicago College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Oct;37(5):510-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01342.x. Epub 2012 Mar 21.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Incretin-based glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor therapies provide glycaemic control with reduced risks associated with weight gain or hypoglycaemia. Incretin therapies are compared with their mechanisms of action, effects on haemoglobin A(1C) (HbA(1C)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial glucose (PPG), body weight, β-cell function, cardiovascular biomarkers and in their safety profiles to aid clinicians in the selection of individualized pharmacotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Relevant articles for a systematic review were identified through PubMed. Randomized, head-to-head comparison studies among incretin therapies were identified and included in the review. Additionally, randomized, controlled monotherapy and combination therapy studies examining glycaemic and extraglycaemic effects of individual incretin therapies from 2007 to 2011 were reviewed.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are generally preferred over DPP-4 inhibitors because of their greater effectiveness in reducing HbA(1C) , FPG and PPG excursions, and greater weight loss potentiation. As a monotherapy option, longer-acting GLP-1 RAs, including liraglutide and exenatide once-weekly, may be preferred at higher HbA(1C) because of their more pronounced effects on FPG. At lower/near normal HbA(1C) , a short-acting GLP-1 RA, such as exenatide twice-daily, may be a better choice as its effects are more pronounced with PPG. Ideal patients or patient situations for DPP-4 inhibitors include patients who need minimal reduction in HbA(1C,) elderly patients, patients who are unwilling or unable to take an injectable agent, when GLP-1 RAs are contraindicated or when the patient will not benefit from weight loss. Treatment benefits common to all incretin-based therapies include minimal hypoglycaemia risk, potential preservation of β-cell function and effective targeting of multiple organs underlying type 2 diabetes and of comorbidities commonly associated with type 2 diabetes, such as obesity and hypertension.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Key differences in mechanisms of action and in glycaemic and extra-glycaemic treatment outcomes exist among incretin therapies, both within the GLP-1 RA class, and between GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors. Clinical judgment acknowledging important differences among incretin therapies and treatment-related patient characteristics will aid in the selection of the appropriate incretin agent for individualized pharmacotherapy.

摘要

已知和目的

基于肠降血糖素的胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂治疗可提供血糖控制,同时降低与体重增加或低血糖相关的风险。将肠降血糖素治疗与它们的作用机制、对糖化血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后血糖(PPG)、体重、β细胞功能、心血管生物标志物以及安全性特征进行比较,以帮助临床医生为 2 型糖尿病患者选择个体化的药物治疗。

方法

通过 PubMed 确定了系统评价的相关文章。确定了肠降血糖素治疗的随机、头对头比较研究,并将其纳入综述。此外,还回顾了 2007 年至 2011 年期间,关于个体肠降血糖素治疗的血糖和血糖外作用的随机对照单药和联合治疗研究。

结果和讨论

由于 GLP-1 RAs 在降低 HbA1c、FPG 和 PPG 方面更有效,并且更能促进体重减轻,因此通常优于 DPP-4 抑制剂。作为一种单药治疗选择,作用时间更长的 GLP-1 RAs,包括利拉鲁肽和每周一次的艾塞那肽,由于其对 FPG 的影响更为明显,可能在 HbA1c 较高时更受欢迎。在较低/接近正常的 HbA1c 时,作用时间较短的 GLP-1 RA,如每日两次的艾塞那肽,可能是更好的选择,因为它对 PPG 的作用更为明显。DPP-4 抑制剂的理想患者或患者情况包括需要最小程度降低 HbA1c 的患者、老年患者、不愿或不能使用注射剂的患者、GLP-1 RAs 禁忌或患者不会从体重减轻中获益的患者。所有基于肠降血糖素的治疗方法都具有共同的治疗益处,包括低血糖风险最小、β细胞功能潜在保护以及有效靶向 2 型糖尿病和与 2 型糖尿病常见的肥胖和高血压等共病相关的多个器官。

新内容和结论

肠降血糖素治疗之间存在作用机制以及血糖和血糖外治疗结果方面的关键差异,包括 GLP-1 RA 类药物内以及 GLP-1 RAs 与 DPP-4 抑制剂之间的差异。在承认肠降血糖素治疗之间存在重要差异以及与治疗相关的患者特征的临床判断将有助于为个体化药物治疗选择合适的肠降血糖素药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验