• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

排放标准的气候影响:汽油车和柴油车的情况。

Climate effects of emission standards: the case for gasoline and diesel cars.

机构信息

CICERO (Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo) P.O. Box 1129, Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2012 May 1;46(9):5205-13. doi: 10.1021/es204190w. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1021/es204190w
PMID:22436085
Abstract

Passenger transport affects climate through various mechanisms involving both long-lived and short-lived climate forcers. Because diesel cars generally emit less CO(2) than gasoline cars, CO(2) emission taxes for vehicle registrations and fuels enhance the consumer preference for diesel cars over gasoline cars. However, with the non-CO(2) components, which have been changed and will be changed under the previous and upcoming vehicle emission standards, what does the shift from gasoline to diesel cars mean for the climate mitigation? By using a simple climate model, we demonstrate that, under the earlier emissions standards (EURO 3 and 4), a diesel car causes a larger warming up to a decade after the emissions than a similar gasoline car due to the higher emissions of black carbon and NO(X) (enhancing the O(3) production). Beyond a decade, the warming caused by a diesel car becomes, however, weaker because of the lower CO(2) emissions. As the latter emissions standards (EURO 5 and 6) are phased in, the short-term warming due to a diesel car becomes smaller primarily due to the lower black carbon emissions. Thus, although results are subject to restrictive assumptions and uncertainties, the switch from gasoline to diesel cars encouraged by CO(2) taxes does not contradict with the climate mitigation focusing on long-term consequences.

摘要

客运通过涉及长寿命和短寿命气候强迫物的各种机制影响气候。由于柴油车通常比汽油车排放更少的二氧化碳,因此车辆注册和燃料的二氧化碳排放税增强了消费者对柴油车的偏好而不是汽油车。然而,随着先前和即将到来的车辆排放标准下已经改变和将要改变的非二氧化碳成分,从汽油车转向柴油车对气候缓解意味着什么?通过使用简单的气候模型,我们表明,在早期的排放标准(EURO 3 和 4)下,由于黑碳和氮氧化物(增强臭氧生成)排放量较高,柴油车在排放后十年内引起的变暖比类似的汽油车更大。然而,十年后,由于二氧化碳排放量较低,柴油车引起的变暖变得较弱。随着后期排放标准(EURO 5 和 6)的逐步实施,由于黑碳排放量较低,柴油车引起的短期变暖变得更小。因此,尽管结果受到限制假设和不确定性的影响,但二氧化碳税鼓励从汽油车向柴油车的转变并不与关注长期后果的气候缓解相矛盾。

相似文献

1
Climate effects of emission standards: the case for gasoline and diesel cars.排放标准的气候影响:汽油车和柴油车的情况。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 May 1;46(9):5205-13. doi: 10.1021/es204190w. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
2
Electric vehicles in China: emissions and health impacts.中国的电动汽车:排放物与健康影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Feb 21;46(4):2018-24. doi: 10.1021/es202347q. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
3
On-road emissions of passenger cars beyond the boundary conditions of the real-driving emissions test.道路行驶车辆排放超过实际行驶排放测试的边界条件。
Environ Res. 2019 Sep;176:108572. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108572. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
4
Variations of significant contribution regions of NO and PN emissions for passenger cars in the real-world driving.实际行驶工况下轿车 NO 和 PN 排放的显著贡献区域变化。
J Hazard Mater. 2022 Feb 15;424(Pt C):127590. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127590. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
5
Real world CO and NO emissions from 149 Euro 5 and 6 diesel, gasoline and hybrid passenger cars.149 辆欧 5 和 6 柴油、汽油和混合动力乘用车的实际 CO 和 NO 排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 15;621:282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.271. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
6
On-board measurement of emissions from liquefied petroleum gas, gasoline and diesel powered passenger cars in Algeria.阿尔及利亚液化石油气、汽油和柴油动力乘用车排放的车载测量。
J Environ Sci (China). 2014 Aug 1;26(8):1651-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
7
A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.替代汽车燃料的生命周期比较。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Oct;50(10):1769-79.
8
Are emissions of black carbon from gasoline vehicles underestimated? Insights from near and on-road measurements.汽油车黑碳排放是否被低估了?来自近程和道路测量的新认识。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 May 1;46(9):4819-28. doi: 10.1021/es2033845. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
9
Regional on-road vehicle running emissions modeling and evaluation for conventional and alternative vehicle technologies.传统和替代车辆技术的区域道路车辆行驶排放建模与评估
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Nov 1;43(21):8449-55. doi: 10.1021/es900535s.
10
Comparison of NO and PN emissions between Euro 6 petrol and diesel passenger cars under real-world driving conditions.实际行驶条件下欧 6 汽油车和柴油乘用车的 NO 和 PN 排放比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 20;801:149789. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149789. Epub 2021 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Cobenefits of replacing car trips with alternative transportation: a review of evidence and methodological issues.替代交通方式取代汽车出行的好处:证据和方法学问题综述。
J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:797312. doi: 10.1155/2013/797312. Epub 2013 Jul 16.