Department of Radiology, Thyroid Center, Daerim St. Mary's Hospital, 978-13 Daerim-dong, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul 150-070, Korea.
Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):909-16. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111300. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of additional radiofrequency (RF) ablation by comparing the results of one and two sessions.
All patients gave written informed consent to participate in this institutional review board-approved prospective study. From September 2007 to February 2008, 30 patients with benign predominantly solid thyroid nodules causing pressure symptoms and/or cosmetic problems were randomly assigned to undergo single-session (group 1, n = 15) or two-session (group 2, n = 15) RF ablation. RF ablation was performed by using an 18-gauge internally cooled electrode with ultrasonographic guidance. Nodule volume and cosmetic and symptom scores were evaluated before ablation and at 1, 3, and 6 months after initial ablation, and quantitative comparisons of these were performed by using the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed rank tests; the Spearman rank test was used for correlation between nodule volume reduction and applied energy.
At 6-month follow-up, there was significant nodule volume reduction, from 13.3 mL ± 12.9 (standard deviation) to 3.8 mL ± 4.4 in group 1 (P = .001), and from 13.0 mL ± 6.8 to 3.0 mL ± 2.2 in group 2 (P = .001). Each group showed significant improvement in cosmetic (P < .0001) and symptom (P = .001) scores. However, there was no significant difference in volume reduction, cosmetic score, and symptom score between two groups (P = .078, P > .99, and P = .259, respectively). In group 1, three of four patients who had a pretreatment nodule volume larger than 20 mL underwent additional RF ablation because of unresolved clinical problems after the first session.
Single-session RF ablation showed significant volume reduction and satisfactory clinical response in most patients. Therefore, additional RF ablation should be limited to patients with a large nodule (>20 mL) or unresolved clinical problems.
通过比较单次和两次治疗的结果,前瞻性评估射频(RF)消融的疗效。
所有患者均书面同意参与本机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性研究。从 2007 年 9 月至 2008 年 2 月,30 名患有良性为主的实性甲状腺结节引起压迫症状和/或美容问题的患者被随机分为单次治疗组(组 1,n = 15)或两次治疗组(组 2,n = 15)。使用超声引导的 18 号内置冷却电极进行 RF 消融。在消融前、初始消融后 1、3 和 6 个月评估结节体积和美容及症状评分,并使用 Mann-Whitney 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行定量比较;使用 Spearman 秩检验进行结节体积缩小与应用能量之间的相关性。
在 6 个月的随访中,组 1 的结节体积从 13.3 ± 12.9 mL(标准差)显著减少到 3.8 ± 4.4 mL(P =.001),组 2 从 13.0 ± 6.8 mL 减少到 3.0 ± 2.2 mL(P =.001)。每组的美容(P <.0001)和症状(P =.001)评分均显著改善。然而,两组之间的体积减少、美容评分和症状评分无显著差异(P =.078,P >.99,P =.259)。在组 1 中,由于第一次治疗后仍存在未解决的临床问题,4 名结节体积大于 20 mL 的患者中有 3 名接受了额外的 RF 消融。
单次 RF 消融在大多数患者中显示出显著的体积缩小和满意的临床反应。因此,额外的 RF 消融应限于结节较大(>20 mL)或仍存在临床问题的患者。