Medical Affairs Europe & Australia, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jun;28(6):911-36. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.679254. Epub 2012 May 9.
This open-label, phase 3b study evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of tapentadol prolonged release and tapentadol immediate release (for acute pain episodes) for severe, chronic low back pain with or without a neuropathic pain component that was inadequately managed in patients taking World Health Organization (WHO) Step I or II analgesics or who were not regularly treated with analgesics.
Average baseline pain intensity was greater than 5 (11-point numerical rating scale-3 [NRS-3; 3-day average pain intensity]) with WHO Step I or II analgesics and greater than 6 with no regular analgesic regimen. WHO Step II analgesics were discontinued before starting study treatment; WHO Step I analgesics or co-analgesics were continued at the same dose. Patients received tapentadol prolonged release (50-250 mg bid) during a 5-week titration and 7-week maintenance period. Tapentadol immediate release was permitted for acute pain episodes (tapentadol prolonged release and immediate release maximum combined dose, ≤500 mg/day). The painDETECT questionnaire was used to define subsets of patients based on the probability of a neuropathic pain component to their low back pain as 'negative', 'unclear', or 'positive'.
NCT00983385.
The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 6 in average pain intensity (NRS-3), using the last observation carried forward to impute missing scores.
In the painDETECT negative (n = 49) and unclear/positive (n = 126) subsets, respectively, mean (SD) changes in pain intensity from baseline to week 6 were -2.4 (2.18) and -3.0 (2.07; both p < 0.0001). Among patients who had not received prior WHO Step II treatment, lower doses of tapentadol prolonged release were generally required with increasing likelihood of a neuropathic pain component. Based on the painDETECT questionnaire and the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), tapentadol prolonged release treatment was also associated with significant improvements in neuropathic pain symptoms, with decreases in the number of pain attacks and the duration of spontaneous pain in the last 24 hours in patients with low back pain with a neuropathic pain component (painDETECT unclear or positive score at baseline or screening). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (incidence ≥10%, n = 176) were nausea, dizziness, headache, dry mouth, fatigue, constipation, diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, and somnolence.
Tapentadol prolonged release was well tolerated and effective for managing severe, chronic low back pain with or without a neuropathic pain component.
这项开放标签、3b 期研究评估了曲马多控释片和曲马多即释片(用于急性疼痛发作)在接受世界卫生组织(WHO)第 I 步或第 II 步镇痛药治疗或未定期接受镇痛药治疗的中重度、慢性腰痛患者中的有效性和耐受性,这些患者的腰痛伴有或不伴有神经病理性疼痛成分,且用 WHO 第 I 步或第 II 步镇痛药治疗效果不佳。
平均基线疼痛强度大于 5(11 点数字评分量表-3 [NRS-3;3 天平均疼痛强度]),用 WHO 第 I 步或第 II 步镇痛药,无规律用镇痛药者疼痛强度大于 6。在开始研究治疗前停用 WHO 第 II 步镇痛药;保留 WHO 第 I 步镇痛药或辅助镇痛药,剂量不变。患者在 5 周滴定期和 7 周维持期内接受曲马多控释片(50-250mg,bid)治疗。允许使用曲马多即释片治疗急性疼痛发作(曲马多控释片和即释片最大联合剂量,≤500mg/天)。采用疼痛 DETECT 问卷根据腰痛中神经病理性疼痛成分的可能性将患者分为亚组:“阴性”、“不确定”或“阳性”。
NCT00983385。
使用末次观察值结转法(LOCF)估算缺失评分,从基线到第 6 周时平均疼痛强度(NRS-3)的变化。
在疼痛 DETECT 阴性(n=49)和不确定/阳性(n=126)亚组中,从基线到第 6 周时疼痛强度的平均(SD)变化分别为-2.4(2.18)和-3.0(2.07;均 P<0.0001)。在未接受过 WHO 第 II 步治疗的患者中,随着神经病理性疼痛成分可能性的增加,通常需要较低剂量的曲马多控释片。基于疼痛 DETECT 问卷和神经病理性疼痛症状量表(NPSI),曲马多控释片治疗还与神经病理性疼痛症状的显著改善相关,腰痛伴有神经病理性疼痛成分的患者(基线或筛查时疼痛 DETECT 不确定或阳性评分)的疼痛发作次数和 24 小时内自发性疼痛持续时间减少。最常见的治疗中出现的不良事件(发生率≥10%,n=176)为恶心、头晕、头痛、口干、疲劳、便秘、腹泻、鼻咽炎和嗜睡。
曲马多控释片耐受性良好,治疗伴有或不伴有神经病理性疼痛成分的中重度、慢性腰痛有效。