• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意缺陷多动障碍成人的冒险决策。

Risky decision making in adults with ADHD.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Hauptstr. 5, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;43(3):938-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.02.002
PMID:22445935
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Risky decision making and disadvantageous choices constitute core characteristics of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Consequences include negative psychosocial and health-related outcomes. However, risky decision making and its interrelations with emotional states in ADHD are poorly understood. Therefore, the authors investigated risky decision making without and after boredom induction in adults with and without ADHD.

METHODS

In study 1, ADHD patients (n = 15) and age/education matched controls (CG; n = 16) were compared on the Game of Dice Task (GDT), an established task measuring decision making in unambiguous situations. In study 2, ADHD patients (n = 14) and CG (n = 13) underwent boredom induction prior to the GDT.

RESULTS

In study 1, ADHD patients selected the disadvantageous alternatives significantly more often than CG. In study 2, no significant group differences were found due to an increase in risky decision making in CG following the boredom induction.

LIMITATIONS

Even if severity of depression did not affect our results, it may be necessary to compare GDT responses in ADHD patients with and without current depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk as a motor of disadvantageous decision making needs to be taken into account in therapeutic contexts as a maintenance factor of dysfunctional behaviour. The findings of study 2 are in line with postulated alterations of emotional state adjustment in ADHD. The link between decisions making and emotional regulation in ADHD needs further attention in research.

摘要

背景和目的

冒险决策和不利选择是注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者的核心特征。其后果包括负面的社会心理和健康相关结果。然而,ADHD 患者的冒险决策及其与情绪状态的相互关系仍知之甚少。因此,作者研究了 ADHD 患者和对照组在无无聊诱导和无聊诱导后进行冒险决策的情况。

方法

在研究 1 中,将 ADHD 患者(n = 15)和年龄/教育匹配的对照组(CG;n = 16)在骰子游戏任务(GDT)上进行比较,GDT 是一种用于测量明确情况下决策制定的既定任务。在研究 2 中,在 GDT 之前,对 ADHD 患者(n = 14)和 CG(n = 13)进行无聊诱导。

结果

在研究 1 中,ADHD 患者选择不利替代方案的频率明显高于 CG。在研究 2 中,由于 CG 在无聊诱导后冒险决策增加,没有发现显著的组间差异。

局限性

即使抑郁严重程度没有影响我们的结果,但比较 ADHD 患者中有无当前抑郁的 GDT 反应可能是必要的。

结论

风险作为不利决策的驱动力需要在治疗环境中被视为功能失调行为的维持因素。研究 2 的结果与 ADHD 中情绪状态调节改变的假设一致。ADHD 中决策制定和情绪调节之间的联系需要在研究中进一步关注。

相似文献

1
Risky decision making in adults with ADHD.注意缺陷多动障碍成人的冒险决策。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;43(3):938-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
2
Risky decision-making in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍中的冒险决策。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 May 15;197(1-2):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
3
Executive functions and risky decision-making in patients with opiate dependence.阿片类药物依赖患者的执行功能与风险决策
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Sep 1;97(1-2):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.017. Epub 2008 May 16.
4
Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson's disease: a neuropsychological and psychophysiological study.帕金森病患者在模糊情境下的决策与风险情境下的决策的分离:一项神经心理学和心理生理学研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Nov;47(13):2882-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.014. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
5
Decision making in adults with ADHD.成人 ADHD 的决策。
J Atten Disord. 2012 Feb;16(2):164-73. doi: 10.1177/1087054709360494. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
6
Impaired decision making and feedback evaluation in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍患者的决策和反馈评价受损。
Psychol Med. 2011 Sep;41(9):1917-27. doi: 10.1017/S003329171000262X. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
7
Do adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder show risk seeking? Disentangling probabilistic decision making by equalizing the favorability of alternatives.注意缺陷多动障碍青少年是否存在冒险寻求?通过使替代方案的有利性均等来区分概率决策。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Apr;125(3):387-98. doi: 10.1037/abn0000140. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
9
Decision-making on an explicit risk-taking task in preadolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的青春期前儿童在明确的冒险任务中的决策情况。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2008;115(2):201-9. doi: 10.1007/s00702-007-0814-5. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
10
Decision making with uncertain reinforcement in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童的不确定强化决策。
Child Neuropsychol. 2010;16(2):145-61. doi: 10.1080/09297040903190774. Epub 2009 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Boredom proneness and inattention in children with and without ADHD: the mediating role of delay aversion.患多动症和未患多动症儿童的无聊倾向与注意力不集中:延迟厌恶的中介作用
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 28;16:1526089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1526089. eCollection 2025.
2
Sex differences in physiological correlates of affectively driven decision-making behavior in adult ADHD.成人注意缺陷多动障碍中情感驱动决策行为的生理相关性的性别差异。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06040-3.
3
Cognitive Correlates of Risky Decision-Making in Individuals with and without ADHD: A Meta-analysis.
注意缺陷多动障碍患者与非患者风险决策的认知关联:一项荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09646-2.
4
Altered interaction of physiological activity and behavior affects risky decision-making in ADHD.生理活动与行为之间的相互作用改变会影响多动症患者的风险决策。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Apr 20;17:1147329. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1147329. eCollection 2023.
5
Differential neural processing of value during decision-making in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls.注意力缺陷多动障碍患者与健康对照者在决策过程中价值的差异神经处理。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2023 Mar 29;48(2):E115-E124. doi: 10.1503/jpn.220123. Print 2023 Mar-Apr.
6
Preference of Virtual Reality Games in Psychological Pressure and Depression Treatment: Discrete Choice Experiment.虚拟现实游戏在心理压力与抑郁症治疗中的偏好:离散选择实验
JMIR Serious Games. 2023 Jan 16;11:e34586. doi: 10.2196/34586.
7
State Boredom Partially Accounts for Gender Differences in Novel Lexicon Learning.状态无聊在一定程度上解释了新词汇学习中的性别差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 29;13:807558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.807558. eCollection 2022.
8
The Effects of Family Transitions on Depressive Symptoms: Differences among Young Adults with and without Childhood Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder.家庭变迁对抑郁症状的影响:有和没有儿童期注意力缺陷/多动障碍症状的年轻人之间的差异
Soc Ment Health. 2020 Nov;10(3):237-256. doi: 10.1177/2156869319859402. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
9
Negation Processing in Children with ADHD: The Generic Problem of Using Negation in Instructions.ADHD 儿童的否定句处理:在指令中使用否定词的一般性问题。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Dec;50(6):1309-1320. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09789-w. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
10
Boredom proneness is associated with noisy decision-making, not risk-taking.无聊倾向与决策时的嘈杂状态有关,而非与冒险行为有关。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jun;239(6):1807-1825. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06098-5. Epub 2021 Apr 8.