Goldberg C C, Yates A
University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson.
Am J Dis Child. 1990 Dec;144(12):1334-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150360060020.
There is confusion and controversy regarding the use of anatomically correct dolls in the evaluation of allegedly sexually abused children. Studies indicate that there is a significant difference between the play behavior of sexually abused children and that of nonabused children when using anatomically correct dolls. Other research suggests that nonabused children are not threatened, sexually stimulated, or excited to aggression by exposure to anatomically correct dolls. These dolls can be used by trained professionals to help make conclusions about a child's background. However, the dolls cannot be used to prove or disprove abuse.
在评估疑似遭受性虐待的儿童时，对于使用解剖学上精确的玩偶存在混淆和争议。研究表明，在使用解剖学上精确的玩偶时，遭受性虐待的儿童与未受虐待的儿童的玩耍行为存在显著差异。其他研究表明，未受虐待的儿童在接触解剖学上精确的玩偶时不会受到威胁、性刺激或激发攻击性。这些玩偶可供训练有素的专业人员用来帮助得出有关儿童背景的结论。然而，这些玩偶不能用于证明或反驳虐待行为。
