Medical Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, 305-811, South Korea.
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jun;20(6):1147-58. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1432-9. Epub 2012 Mar 25.
Controlling cancer-related pain is an important component in the palliative care of cancer patients. The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating cancer pain.
Fourteen databases were searched from their inception through April 2011. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were included if acupuncture was used as the sole treatment or as a part of a combination therapy for cancer pain. Studies were included if they were controlled with a placebo or controlled against a drug-therapy or no-treatment group. The Cochrane criteria were used to assess the risk of bias.
A total of 15 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. All of the included RCTs were associated with a high risk of bias. The majority of acupuncture treatments or combination therapies with analgesics exhibited favourable effects compared with conventional treatments in individual studies. However, a meta-analysis suggested that acupuncture did not generate a better effect than drug therapy (n = 886; risk ratio (RR), 1.12; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.28; P = 0.09). The comparison between acupuncture plus drug therapy and drug therapy alone demonstrated a significant difference in favour of the combination therapy (n = 437; RR, 1.36; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.64; P = 0.003). The results of this systematic review provide no strong evidence for the effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of cancer pain.
The total number of RCTs included in the analysis and their methodological quality were too low to draw firm conclusions. Future rigorous RCTs will be necessary to assess the clinical efficacy of acupuncture in this area.
控制癌相关痛是癌症患者姑息治疗的重要组成部分。本研究的目的在于评估针刺治疗癌痛的疗效。
检索了 14 个数据库,时间范围从建库至 2011 年 4 月。仅纳入将针刺作为单一疗法或联合疗法治疗癌痛的随机对照试验(randomised clinical trials,RCT)。研究需采用安慰剂或药物疗法或空白对照。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估标准进行质量评价。
共纳入 15 项 RCT。所有纳入 RCT 均存在较高的偏倚风险。在个体研究中,多数针刺治疗或联合镇痛药物治疗与常规治疗相比有较好的效果。但荟萃分析显示,针刺与药物疗法相比并无优势(n = 886;RR,1.12;95%CI 0.98 至 1.28;P = 0.09)。与单纯药物治疗相比,针刺联合药物治疗具有显著优势(n = 437;RR,1.36;95%CI 1.13 至 1.64;P = 0.003)。本系统评价结果并未提供有力证据表明针刺在癌痛管理中有确切疗效。
纳入分析的 RCT 数量少,且方法学质量低,难以得出确切结论。未来需要开展严格的 RCT 来评估针刺在这一领域的临床疗效。