Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Autism Res. 2012 Aug;5(4):231-44. doi: 10.1002/aur.1224. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are associated with differences in sensory sensitivity and affective response to sensory stimuli, the neural basis of which is still largely unknown. We used psychophysics and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate responses to somatosensory stimulation with three textured surfaces that spanned a range of roughness and pleasantness in a sample of adults with ASD and a control group. While psychophysical ratings of roughness and pleasantness were largely similar across the two groups, the ASD group gave pleasant and unpleasant textures more extreme average ratings than did controls. In addition, their ratings for a neutral texture were more variable than controls, indicating they are less consistent in evaluating a stimulus that is affectively ambiguous. Changes in brain blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal in response to stimulation with these textures differed substantially between the groups, with the ASD group exhibiting diminished responses compared to the control group, particularly for pleasant and neutral textures. For the most unpleasant texture, the ASD group exhibited greater BOLD response than controls in affective somatosensory processing areas such as the posterior cingulate cortex and the insula. The amplitude of response in the insula in response to the unpleasant texture was positively correlated with social impairment as measured by the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R). These results suggest that people with ASD tend to show diminished response to pleasant and neutral stimuli, and exaggerated limbic responses to unpleasant stimuli, which may contribute to diminished social reward associated with touch, perpetuating social withdrawal, and aberrant social development.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)与对感觉刺激的敏感性和情感反应的差异有关,其神经基础在很大程度上仍然未知。我们使用心理物理学和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)技术,在 ASD 患者和对照组的成年样本中,研究了对跨越粗糙度和愉悦度范围的三种纹理表面的躯体感觉刺激的反应。虽然两组对粗糙度和愉悦度的主观评价在很大程度上相似,但 ASD 组对愉悦和不愉悦的纹理的平均评价比对照组更为极端。此外,他们对中性纹理的评价比对照组更具变异性,表明他们在评估情感上模棱两可的刺激时一致性较差。两组对这些纹理刺激的大脑血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号变化有很大差异,与对照组相比,ASD 组的反应明显减弱,特别是对愉悦和中性纹理。对于最不愉快的纹理,与对照组相比,ASD 组在躯体感觉处理区域(如后扣带回和脑岛)中表现出更大的 BOLD 反应。在岛叶中对不愉快纹理的反应幅度与孤独症诊断访谈修订版(ADI-R)测量的社交障碍呈正相关。这些结果表明,ASD 患者对愉悦和中性刺激的反应减弱,对不愉快刺激的边缘反应增强,这可能导致与触觉相关的社交奖励减少,从而加剧社交退缩和异常社交发展。