• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿奇霉素群体治疗沙眼控制:两个疗程中儿童不参与的风险因素。

Azithromycin mass treatment for trachoma control: risk factors for non-participation of children in two treatment rounds.

机构信息

Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(3):e1576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001576. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001576
PMID:22448296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3308937/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Persistent non-participation of children in mass drug administration (MDAs) for trachoma may reduce program impact. Risk factors that identify families where participation is a problem or program characteristics that foster non-participation are poorly understood. We examined risk factors for households with at least one child who did not participate in two MDAs compared to households where all children participated in both MDAs.

METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a case control study in 28 Tanzanian communities. Cases included all 152 households with at least one child who did not participate in the 2008 and 2009 MDAs with azithromycin. Controls consisted of a random sample of 460 households where all children participated in both MDAs. A questionnaire was asked of all families. Random-intercept logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), control for clustering, and adjust for community size. In total, 140 case households and 452 control households were included in the analyses. Compared to controls, guardians in case households had higher odds of reporting excellent health (OR 4.12 (CI 95% 1.57-10.86)), reporting a burden due to family health (OR 3.15 (95% CI 1.35-7.35)), reduced ability to rely on others for assistance (OR 1.66 (95% CI 1.01-2.75)), being in a two (versus five) days distribution program (OR 3.31 (95% CI 1.68-6.50)) and living in a community with < 2 community treatment assistants (CTAs)/1000 residents (OR 2.07 (95% CI 1.04-4.12). Furthermore, case households were more likely to have more children, younger guardians, unfamiliarity with CTAs, and CTAs with more travel time to their assigned households (p-values < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Compared to full participation households, households with persistent non-participation had a higher burden of familial responsibility and seemed less connected in the community. Additional distribution days and lessening CTAs' travel time to their furthest assigned households may prevent non-participation.

摘要

背景

儿童持续不参与大规模药物治疗(MDA)可能会降低项目效果。导致部分家庭参与项目出现问题的风险因素或促进儿童不参与的项目特征尚不清楚。我们调查了与所有儿童均参与两次阿齐霉素 MDA 的家庭相比,至少有一个儿童未参与两次 MDA 的家庭的风险因素。

方法/主要发现:我们在坦桑尼亚的 28 个社区进行了病例对照研究。病例组包括所有在 2008 年和 2009 年的阿齐霉素 MDA 中,有一个或多个儿童未参与的 152 户家庭。对照组由所有儿童均参与两次 MDA 的 460 户家庭随机抽样组成。向所有家庭发放问卷。采用随机截距逻辑回归模型估计优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI),对聚类进行控制,并调整社区规模。共有 140 个病例家庭和 452 个对照家庭参与分析。与对照组相比,病例组的监护人报告健康状况极佳的可能性更高(OR 4.12(95%CI 95% 1.57-10.86)),报告因家庭健康而负担过重的可能性更高(OR 3.15(95%CI 1.35-7.35)),依靠他人帮助的能力降低(OR 1.66(95%CI 1.01-2.75)),参加两天(而非五天)分配方案的可能性更高(OR 3.31(95%CI 1.68-6.50)),以及所在社区每 1000 名居民的社区治疗助理(CTA)数量不足 2 名(OR 2.07(95%CI 1.04-4.12))。此外,病例组家庭中儿童数量更多、监护人更年轻、对 CTA 不熟悉以及 CTA 到其指定家庭的旅行时间更长的可能性更高(p 值 < 0.05)。

结论/意义:与完全参与家庭相比,持续不参与家庭的家庭责任负担更重,社区联系也更少。增加分配日数并减少 CTA 到最远指定家庭的旅行时间可能会防止不参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a303/3308937/5e991863c698/pntd.0001576.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a303/3308937/5e991863c698/pntd.0001576.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a303/3308937/5e991863c698/pntd.0001576.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Azithromycin mass treatment for trachoma control: risk factors for non-participation of children in two treatment rounds.阿奇霉素群体治疗沙眼控制:两个疗程中儿童不参与的风险因素。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(3):e1576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001576. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
2
Mass treatment with azithromycin for trachoma control: participation clusters in households.大规模使用阿奇霉素治疗沙眼控制:家庭参与群组。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Oct 5;4(10):e838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000838.
3
Community mass treatment with azithromycin for trachoma: Factors associated with change in participation of children from the first to the second round.阿奇霉素用于沙眼的社区群体治疗:与儿童从第一轮至第二轮参与情况变化相关的因素
Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2015 Apr;3(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2013.06.001.
4
Can we stop mass drug administration prior to 3 annual rounds in communities with low prevalence of trachoma?: PRET Ziada trial results.在沙眼患病率低的社区,我们能否在完成 3 年年度轮次之前停止大规模药物治疗?:PRET Ziada 试验结果。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;131(4):431-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.2356.
5
Non-participation during azithromycin mass treatment for trachoma in The Gambia: heterogeneity and risk factors.冈比亚沙眼阿奇霉素群体治疗中的未参与情况:异质性与风险因素
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Aug 28;8(8):e3098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003098. eCollection 2014 Aug.
6
Risk factors for ocular chlamydia after three mass azithromycin distributions.三种阿奇霉素大规模分发后眼部衣原体感染的风险因素。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Dec;5(12):e1441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001441. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
7
Do infants increase the risk of re-emergent infection in households after mass drug administration for trachoma?大规模药物治疗沙眼后,婴儿会增加家庭中再次感染的风险吗?
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 29;52(8):6040-2. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7372.
8
Surveillance and Azithromycin Treatment for Newcomers and Travelers Evaluation (ASANTE) Trial: Design and Baseline Characteristics.新移民和旅行者评估的监测与阿奇霉素治疗(ASANTE)试验:设计与基线特征
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;23(6):347-353. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1238947. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
9
Population-based coverage survey results following the mass drug administration of azithromycin for the treatment of trachoma in Amhara, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区大规模使用阿奇霉素治疗沙眼的基于人群的覆盖情况调查结果。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Feb 16;12(2):e0006270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006270. eCollection 2018 Feb.
10
Longitudinal evaluation of three azithromycin distribution strategies for treatment of trachoma in a sub-Saharan African country, Mali.在撒哈拉以南非洲国家马里,对三种阿奇霉素分配策略治疗沙眼的纵向评估。
Acta Trop. 2007 Jan;101(1):40-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.12.003. Epub 2006 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Using community-based participatory approaches to improve access to mass drug administration for trachoma elimination in a pastoral conflict area of Kenya.采用社区参与式方法改善肯尼亚一个牧民冲突地区的沙眼消除机会,以提供大规模药物治疗。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Nov 11;18(11):e0012653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012653. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Risk factors for non-participation in ivermectin and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine mass drug administration for malaria control in the MASSIV trial.MASSIV 试验中,控制疟疾的伊维菌素和双氢青蒿素哌喹大规模药物治疗中不参与的风险因素。
Malar J. 2024 Feb 22;23(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-04878-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Design and baseline data of a randomized trial to evaluate coverage and frequency of mass treatment with azithromycin: the Partnership for Rapid Elimination of Trachoma (PRET) in Tanzania and The Gambia.一项评估阿奇霉素群体治疗覆盖率和频率的随机试验的设计与基线数据:坦桑尼亚和冈比亚的沙眼快速消除伙伴关系(PRET)
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;18(1):20-9. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2010.545500.
2
Mass treatment with azithromycin for trachoma control: participation clusters in households.大规模使用阿奇霉素治疗沙眼控制:家庭参与群组。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Oct 5;4(10):e838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000838.
3
Programmatic aspects of dropouts in child vaccination in Bangladesh: findings from a prospective study.
To eliminate trachoma: Azithromycin mass drug administration coverage and associated factors among adults in Goro district, Southeast Ethiopia.
消除沙眼:在埃塞俄比亚东南部戈罗地区,对成年人进行阿奇霉素大规模药物治疗的覆盖范围和相关因素。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Jun 27;16(6):e0010169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010169. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Patient perceived barriers to surgical follow-up: Study of 6-month post-operative trichiasis surgery follow-up in Tanzania.患者对手术随访的认知障碍:坦桑尼亚 6 个月后发性倒睫手术后随访研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 19;16(3):e0247994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247994. eCollection 2021.
5
Patterns of individual non-treatment during multiple rounds of mass drug administration for control of soil-transmitted helminths in the TUMIKIA trial, Kenya: a secondary longitudinal analysis.肯尼亚 TUMIKIA 试验中多次大规模药物驱虫控制土源性蠕虫病期间个体非治疗模式:二次纵向分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Nov;8(11):e1418-e1426. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30344-2.
6
Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection: elimination with mass drug administration.眼型沙眼衣原体感染:大规模药物治疗消除。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2019 Mar;17(3):189-200. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1577136. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
7
Population coverage and factors associated with participation following a mass drug administration of azithromycin for trachoma elimination in Amhara, Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区,大规模给予阿奇霉素治疗沙眼的人群覆盖情况以及与参与相关的因素。
Trop Med Int Health. 2019 Apr;24(4):493-501. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13208. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
8
Coverage of azithromycin mass treatment for trachoma elimination in Northwestern Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚西北部阿奇霉素群体给药消除沙眼的覆盖率:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0868-1.
9
Coverage, social mobilization and challenges of mass Zithromax administration campaign in South and South East zones of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: A cross sectional study.埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷地区南、东南区大规模阿奇霉素投药运动的覆盖范围、社会动员和挑战:一项横断面研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Feb 26;12(2):e0006288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006288. eCollection 2018 Feb.
10
Community mass treatment with azithromycin for trachoma: Factors associated with change in participation of children from the first to the second round.阿奇霉素用于沙眼的社区群体治疗:与儿童从第一轮至第二轮参与情况变化相关的因素
Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2015 Apr;3(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2013.06.001.
孟加拉国儿童疫苗接种中辍学现象的规划方面:前瞻性研究的结果。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011 Apr;23(2):141-50. doi: 10.1177/1010539509342119. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
4
Children not receiving adequate immunization in Ibadan, Nigeria: what reasons and beliefs do their mothers have?尼日利亚伊巴丹未获得充分免疫接种的儿童:其母亲有哪些理由和看法?
Niger J Clin Pract. 2010 Jun;13(2):173-8.
5
Does onchocerciasis transmission take place in hypoendemic areas? a study from the North Region of Cameroon.在低流行区是否存在盘尾丝虫病传播?来自喀麦隆北部地区的一项研究。
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 May;15(5):645-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02501.x. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
6
Socioeconomic factors play a more important role in childhood vaccination coverage than parental perceptions: a cross-sectional study in Greece.社会经济因素在儿童疫苗接种率方面比家长认知发挥更重要的作用:希腊的一项横断面研究。
Vaccine. 2010 Feb 17;28(7):1861-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.078. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
7
Child immunization coverage in urban slums of Bangladesh: impact of an intervention package.孟加拉国城市贫民窟的儿童免疫接种覆盖率:一揽子干预措施的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Jan;25(1):50-60. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp041. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
8
Neglected tropical diseases in sub-saharan Africa: review of their prevalence, distribution, and disease burden.撒哈拉以南非洲的被忽视热带病:患病率、分布及疾病负担综述
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Aug 25;3(8):e412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000412.
9
Estimating household and community transmission of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis.估算眼型沙眼衣原体在家庭和社区中的传播。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(3):e401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000401. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
10
Eliminating blinding trachoma.消除致盲性沙眼。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 24;358(17):1777-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0708546.