Suppr超能文献

肯尼亚 TUMIKIA 试验中多次大规模药物驱虫控制土源性蠕虫病期间个体非治疗模式:二次纵向分析。

Patterns of individual non-treatment during multiple rounds of mass drug administration for control of soil-transmitted helminths in the TUMIKIA trial, Kenya: a secondary longitudinal analysis.

机构信息

Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Eastern and Southern Africa Centre of International Parasite Control, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya; Pwani University Bioscience Research Centre, Pwani University, Kilifi, Kenya.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Nov;8(11):e1418-e1426. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30344-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have been done of patterns of treatment during mass drug administration (MDA) to control neglected tropical diseases. We used routinely collected individual-level treatment records that had been collated for the Tuangamize Minyoo Kenya Imarisha Afya (Swahili for Eradicate Worms in Kenya for Better Health [TUMIKIA]) trial, done in coastal Kenya from 2015 to 2017. In this analysis we estimate the extent of and factors associated with the same individuals not being treated over multiple rounds of MDA, which we term systematic non-treatment.

METHODS

We linked the baseline population of the TUMIKIA trial randomly assigned to receive biannual community-wide MDA for soil-transmitted helminthiasis to longitudinal records on receipt of treatment in any of the four treatment rounds of the study. We fitted logistic regression models to estimate the association of non-treatment in a given round with non-treatment in the previous round, controlling for identified predictors of non-treatment. We also used multinomial logistic regression to identify factors associated with part or no treatment versus complete treatment.

FINDINGS

36 327 participants were included in our analysis: 16 236 children aged 2-14 years and 20 091 adults aged 15 years or older. The odds of having no treatment recorded was higher if a participant was not treated during the previous round of MDA (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·60, 95% CI 3·08-4·20 for children and 5·58, 5·01-6·21 for adults). For children, school attendance and rural residence reduced the odds of receiving part or no treatment, whereas odds were increased by least poor socioeconomic status and living in an urban or periurban household. Women had higher odds than men of receiving part or no treatment. However, when those with pregnancy or childbirth in the previous 2 weeks were excluded, women became more likely to receive complete treatment. Adults aged 20-25 years were the age group with the highest odds of receiving part (OR 1·41, 95% CI 1·22-1·63) or no treatment (OR 1·81, 95% CI 1·53-2·14).

INTERPRETATION

Non-treatment was associated with specific sociodemographic groups and characteristics and did not occcur at random. This finding has important implications for MDA programme effectiveness, the relevance of which will intensify as disease prevalence decreases and infections become increasingly clustered.

FUNDING

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Joint Global Health Trials Scheme of the Medical Research Council, UK Department for International Development, Wellcome Trust, Children's Investment Fund Foundation, and London Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases.

摘要

背景

鲜有研究关注大规模药物治疗(MDA)期间的治疗模式,以控制被忽视的热带病。我们使用常规收集的个体治疗记录,这些记录是为了 2015 年至 2017 年在肯尼亚沿海进行的 Tuangamize Minyoo Kenya Imarisha Afya(斯瓦希里语,意为在肯尼亚消灭蠕虫以改善健康)试验而整理的。在这项分析中,我们估计了同一人群在多次 MDA 中未接受治疗的程度和相关因素,我们将其称为系统性未治疗。

方法

我们将 TUMIKIA 试验的基线人群随机分配接受每两年一次的社区范围的土壤传播性蠕虫病 MDA,与研究的四个治疗轮次中任何一次治疗的纵向记录相联系。我们使用逻辑回归模型来估计给定轮次未治疗与前一轮次未治疗之间的关联,同时控制未治疗的已知预测因素。我们还使用多项逻辑回归来确定与部分或无治疗与完全治疗相关的因素。

结果

我们的分析共纳入了 36327 名参与者:16236 名 2-14 岁儿童和 20091 名 15 岁及以上成人。如果参与者在前一轮 MDA 中未接受治疗,那么他们未接受治疗的记录可能性更高(儿童的调整后优势比[OR]为 3.60,95%CI 为 3.08-4.20,成人的 OR 为 5.58,95%CI 为 5.01-6.21)。对于儿童,上学和农村居住降低了接受部分或无治疗的几率,而最贫困的社会经济地位和居住在城市或城乡结合部家庭则增加了几率。女性接受部分或无治疗的几率高于男性。然而,当排除在前 2 周内怀孕或分娩的女性时,女性更有可能接受完全治疗。20-25 岁的成年人是接受部分(OR 1.41,95%CI 1.22-1.63)或无治疗(OR 1.81,95%CI 1.53-2.14)的几率最高的年龄组。

解释

未治疗与特定的社会人口统计学群体和特征有关,而不是随机发生的。这一发现对 MDA 计划的有效性具有重要意义,随着疾病流行率的降低和感染越来越集中,其相关性将加剧。

资助

比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会、英国医学研究理事会联合全球卫生试验计划、英国国际发展部、威康信托基金会、儿童投资基金基金会和伦敦热带病防治中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14bb/7564382/ee7ce9db209e/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验