Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Personal Disord. 2010 Apr;1(2):123-6. doi: 10.1037/a0019975.
In their article, Krueger and Eaton (pp. 97-118, this issue) advocate for a "more complete and extensive integration of personality traits in future DSMs [Diagnostic and Statistical Manuals of Mental Disorders], via the explicit inclusion of an empirically based, dimensional personality trait model" (p. 97) and review the "diverse ways in which the inclusion of an empirically based personality trait model could constitute a critical innovation in the transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5" (p. 113). Krueger and Eaton's proposal that (DSM-5) adopt a dimensional personality trait approach exemplifies the difficulties of devising a classification scheme that satisfies the needs of the both the clinical and research communities. In this instance, the challenge is adapting a complex dimensional trait scheme developed and utilized almost exclusively by the research community, for clinical use.
在他们的文章中，Krueger 和 Eaton（第 97-118 页，本期）主张“在未来的 DSM 中更完整和广泛地整合人格特质，通过明确纳入一个基于经验的、维度的人格特质模型”（第 97 页），并回顾了“纳入基于经验的人格特质模型的多种方式如何在从 DSM-IV 到 DSM-5 的转变中构成一个关键的创新”（第 113 页）。Krueger 和 Eaton 提出（DSM-5）采用维度人格特质方法，这例证了设计一个既能满足临床需求又能满足研究需求的分类方案所面临的困难。在这种情况下，挑战是要使一个由研究界几乎专门开发和使用的复杂维度特质方案适应临床使用。
