Suppr超能文献

关于“人格特质与精神障碍分类:DSM-5 更完整的整合与精神病理学实证模型”的述评。

Commentary on "Personality traits and the classification of mental disorders: toward a more complete integration in DSM-5 and an empirical model of psychopathology".

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial and Personality Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2010 Apr;1(2):119-22. doi: 10.1037/a0019974.

Abstract

This article develops the larger theme that the fundamental quantitatively developed architecture of personality provides a sound base for classifying all areas of psychopathology and, more specifically, should underlie the current effort to revise the classification of personality disorders (PDs) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). My commentary is organized around what I perceive to be four significant problems with the proposed change to a trait-based system: (1) unfamiliarity to clinicians (and possibly unfeasibility), (2) lack of clinical utility, (3) the preliminary quality of the science upon which the proposed change is based, and (4) harmful effects on the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD).

摘要

本文阐述了一个更大的主题,即人格的基本定量发展结构为精神病理学的所有领域提供了一个合理的分类基础,更具体地说,它应该为目前修订《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中人格障碍(PD)分类的努力提供依据。我的评论围绕着我认为特质为基础的系统改变存在四个显著问题展开:(1)临床医生不熟悉(可能也不可行),(2)缺乏临床实用性,(3)提议改变所基于的科学初步质量,以及(4)对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)诊断的有害影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验