Arisanti Nita
Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung Indonesia.
Asia Pac Fam Med. 2012 Mar 27;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1447-056X-11-2.
In many countries, private general practitioners are the first contact in health services for people with symptoms of tuberculosis. Targeting the private sector has been recommended in previous studies to improve tuberculosis control. A brief face-to-face intervention using Catharsis Education Action (CEA) method, repeated at periodic intervals, seems to change physicians' attitudes, beliefs and practice.The objective of the study was to determine the effectiveness of CEA method in improving the private general practitioners' (PPs) adherence to the national guideline on the management of tuberculosis patients in Bandung District, Indonesia.
A randomized controlled trial was done. For the intervention group, a session of the CEA method was delivered to PPs while brief reminder with provision of pamphlet was used for the comparative group.
A total of 82 PPs were included in the analysis. The intervention group showed some positive trends in adherence especially in the use of sputum as first laboratory examination (RR = 1.24) and follow up (RR = 1.37), though not reaching statistical significance. After intervention PPs in CEA group maintained the adherence, but PPs in pamphlets group showed deterioration (score before to after: -12.5).
Face to face education using CEA method seems to be as effective as brief reminder with provision of pamphlet in improving the adherence. CEA offers additional information that can be useful in designing intervention programs to improve the adherence to guideline.
在许多国家,私人全科医生是有结核病症状者获得卫生服务的首诊医生。以往研究建议针对私营部门以改善结核病控制。采用宣泄教育行动(CEA)方法进行的简短面对面干预,定期重复进行,似乎能改变医生的态度、信念和行为。本研究的目的是确定CEA方法在提高印度尼西亚万隆地区私人全科医生(PPs)对结核病患者管理国家指南的依从性方面的有效性。
开展了一项随机对照试验。对于干预组,向私人全科医生提供了一次CEA方法培训,而对照组则采用提供宣传册的简短提醒方式。
共有82名私人全科医生纳入分析。干预组在依从性方面呈现出一些积极趋势,特别是在将痰作为首次实验室检查(相对危险度=1.24)和随访(相对危险度=1.37)方面,尽管未达到统计学显著性。干预后,CEA组的私人全科医生保持了依从性,但宣传册组的私人全科医生依从性出现恶化(前后得分:-12.5)。
采用CEA方法进行面对面教育在提高依从性方面似乎与提供宣传册的简短提醒同样有效。CEA提供了额外信息,有助于设计干预项目以提高对指南的依从性。