Portero J L, Rubio M
Tuberculosis Research and Training Center, Epidemiological Unit, Central Chest Clinic, Santa Cruz, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Trop Med Int Health. 2003 Apr;8(4):329-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01032.x.
To investigate the knowledge, attitudes and perspectives of the Filipino private physicians (PPs) on tuberculosis (TB) control issues in the Philippines and their implications for future governmental public health policies.
Cross-sectional telephone survey from June to October 2001.
In each of the 78 provinces of the Philippines we randomly selected 10 PPs from the provincial capital city, five PPs from an urban centre with more than 50,000 population, and one PP from 15 rural villages with <50,000 population, making a total of 30 PPs per province. These data were complemented with information from focus group discussions with health workers and policy makers working in TB control, and through personal interviews with PPs.
We interviewed 1355 (57.9%) of 2340 PPs identified. TB was diagnosed mainly through X-ray (87.9%) and usually treated with inappropriate regimens of anti-TB drugs (89.3%). The PPs did not follow-up their TB patients, did not trace the defaulters (97.9%) and did not identify contacts (91.4%). Only 24.2% knew the National Tuberculosis Programme (NTP) policies in depth. They defined the NTP's weakest points as diagnosis through sputum microscopy (59.2%) and the management of smear negative patients (29.7%). Most PPs were willing to collaborate with the NTP (83.3%) provided they were paid (38.4%). More than a half (51.5%) objected to obligatory reporting of new TB cases. The PPs based their success in attracting TB patients to their offices on confidentiality (46.1%) and on the kind treatment and flexibility given (43.7%).
Diagnosis and treatment of TB patients is a daily issue for the PPs in the Philippines, although they did not follow usually the NTP guidelines. The majority of the PPs wished to collaborate with the NTP provided they were paid.
调查菲律宾私立医生对菲律宾结核病控制问题的知识、态度和观点,以及这些对未来政府公共卫生政策的影响。
2001年6月至10月的横断面电话调查。
在菲律宾的78个省份中,我们从每个省会城市随机选取10名私立医生,从人口超过5万的城市中心选取5名私立医生,从人口少于5万的15个乡村中各选取1名私立医生,每个省份共30名私立医生。这些数据通过与从事结核病控制工作的卫生工作者和政策制定者进行焦点小组讨论获得的信息,以及通过对私立医生的个人访谈得到补充。
我们对确定的2340名私立医生中的1355名(57.9%)进行了访谈。结核病主要通过X线诊断(87.9%),并且通常采用不恰当的抗结核药物治疗方案(89.3%)。私立医生不随访他们的结核病患者,不追查失访者(97.9%),也不识别接触者(91.4%)。只有24.2%的人深入了解国家结核病规划(NTP)政策。他们认为NTP最薄弱的环节是痰涂片显微镜检查诊断(59.2%)和涂片阴性患者的管理(29.7%)。大多数私立医生愿意与NTP合作(83.3%),前提是得到报酬(38.4%)。超过一半(51.5%)的人反对强制报告新的结核病病例。私立医生认为他们成功吸引结核病患者到其诊所的原因在于保密(46.1%)以及给予的亲切治疗和灵活性(43.7%)。
对菲律宾的私立医生来说,结核病患者的诊断和治疗是日常事务,尽管他们通常不遵循NTP指南。大多数私立医生希望在得到报酬的情况下与NTP合作。