• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估语音音高感知的A§E测试组的开发。

Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech.

作者信息

Heeren Willemijn, Coene Martine, Vaerenberg Bart, Avram Andrei, Cardinaletti Anna, del Bo Luca, Pascu Alexandru, Volpato Francesca, Govaerts Paul J

机构信息

Leiden University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cochlear Implants Int. 2012 Nov;13(4):206-19. doi: 10.1179/1754762811Y.0000000035. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1179/1754762811Y.0000000035
PMID:22449360
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The auditory speech sounds evaluation 2009 test battery for assessment of speech pitch perception is presented. It was designed to (a) assess perception of pitch in linguistic contexts without the confounds of secondary acoustic cues, (b) be usable with listeners from different language backgrounds, and (c) be suitable for use in a clinical setting. The need for this test battery arises from increased awareness of the importance of prosody in clinical practice, and the development of methods for improving pitch perception in listeners with profound hearing losses.

METHODS

Identification and discrimination tasks based on linguistic contexts were developed to establish listeners' just noticeable differences (JNDs) for pitch changes. Stimuli were pseudosentences and pseudowords based on speech from a female speaker, overlain with stylized pitch contours. Target pitch excursions were varied from the 200 Hz baseline to a maximum of 349 Hz. Ninety normal-hearing listeners participated in test validation that assessed goals (a)-(c), established test-retest reliability, and gathered normative data.

RESULTS

The JNDs on non-linguistic, control tasks were lower than on linguistic ones, showing that non-linguistic tasks may overestimate pitch perception in speech. Listeners from different language backgrounds scored comparably on most linguistic tasks, and test-retest differences were non-significant. Test usability as evidenced by task duration and subject experience seemed satisfactory for clinical use.

摘要

目的

介绍用于评估语音音高感知的2009年听觉语音声音评估测试组。其设计目的是:(a)在没有次要声学线索干扰的语言环境中评估音高感知;(b)适用于来自不同语言背景的听众;(c)适合在临床环境中使用。开发此测试组的需求源于临床实践中对韵律重要性的认识不断提高,以及为改善重度听力损失听众的音高感知而开发的方法。

方法

开发基于语言环境的识别和辨别任务,以确定听众对音高变化的刚可察觉差异(JND)。刺激材料是基于女性说话者语音的伪句子和伪单词,并叠加了风格化的音高轮廓。目标音高偏移从200赫兹基线变化到最大349赫兹。90名听力正常的听众参与了测试验证,该验证评估了目标(a)至(c),确立了重测信度,并收集了常模数据。

结果

非语言控制任务的JND低于语言任务的JND,表明非语言任务可能高估了语音中的音高感知。来自不同语言背景的听众在大多数语言任务上得分相当,重测差异不显著。从任务时长和受试者体验来看,测试可用性似乎足以满足临床使用。

相似文献

1
Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech.用于评估语音音高感知的A§E测试组的开发。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2012 Nov;13(4):206-19. doi: 10.1179/1754762811Y.0000000035. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
2
The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and nonspeech sounds.语言经验对语音和非语音声音音高认知加工的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Feb;32(1):97-103. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.97.
3
Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.人工耳蜗植入者在噪声环境中对元音和韵律的感知。
J Commun Disord. 2013 Sep-Dec;46(5-6):449-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
4
Effects of language experience and expectations on attention to consonants and tones in English and Mandarin Chinese.语言经验和期望对英语和汉语普通话中辅音及声调注意力的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Nov;136(5):2827-38. doi: 10.1121/1.4898047.
5
Development of the ORCA nonsense syllable test.ORCA 无意义音节测试的编制。
Ear Hear. 2010 Dec;31(6):779-95. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e97bfb.
6
Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities.听众的非母语语音识别与分类能力之间的关系。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jan;137(1):EL44-50. doi: 10.1121/1.4903916.
7
Categorical perception of intonation contrasts: effects of listeners' language background.语调对比的范畴感知:受听者语言背景的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Jun;131(6):EL427-33. doi: 10.1121/1.4710836.
8
Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants.成人使用人工耳蜗的韵律感知和音高辨别
Int J Audiol. 2015 Jul;54(7):444-52. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.997314. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
9
Clinical assessment of pitch perception.临床音高感知评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jul;32(5):736-41. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31821f1584.
10
Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech.母语影响言语的节奏组合。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Nov;134(5):3828-43. doi: 10.1121/1.4823848.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-frequency pitch sensitivity and speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant users fitted with fine structure strategies.采用精细结构策略的成年人工耳蜗使用者的低频音调敏感度和言语感知表现
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09449-y.
2
Low-frequency pitch coding: relationships with speech-in-noise and music perception by pediatric populations with typical hearing and cochlear implants.低频音调编码:与典型听力和人工耳蜗植入儿童群体的噪声中言语感知和音乐感知的关系。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;281(7):3475-3482. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08445-4. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
3
Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.
低频音高提示的词汇重音感知以及对人工耳蜗使用者和正常听力成年人噪声中言语感知的深入了解。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;276(10):2673-2680. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05502-9. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
4
A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study of Tinnitus Awareness and Impact in a Population of Adult Cochlear Implant Users.成人人工耳蜗使用者耳鸣知晓和影响的横断面问卷调查研究。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jan/Feb;40(1):135-142. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000601.
5
Prosodic Boundary Effects on Syntactic Disambiguation in Children With Cochlear Implants.韵律边界对人工耳蜗植入儿童句法歧义消解的影响
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 May 17;61(5):1188-1202. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0036.
6
Low-frequency pitch perception in children with cochlear implants in comparison to normal hearing peers.与听力正常的同龄人相比,人工耳蜗植入儿童的低频音高感知。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3115-22. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3313-y. Epub 2014 Sep 30.