Suppr超能文献

个体在人类恐惧学习中差异的神经基础:来自同时 fMRI、恐惧增强的 startle 反应和 US 预期数据的证据。

Neural substrates of individual differences in human fear learning: evidence from concurrent fMRI, fear-potentiated startle, and US-expectancy data.

机构信息

University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Sep;12(3):499-512. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0089-7.

Abstract

To provide insight into individual differences in fear learning, we examined the emotional and cognitive expressions of discriminative fear conditioning in direct relation to its neural substrates. Contrary to previous behavioral-neural (fMRI) research on fear learning--in which the emotional expression of fear was generally indexed by skin conductance--we used fear-potentiated startle, a more reliable and specific index of fear. While we obtained concurrent fear-potentiated startle, neuroimaging (fMRI), and US-expectancy data, healthy participants underwent a fear-conditioning paradigm in which one of two conditioned stimuli (CS(+) but not CS(-)) was paired with a shock (unconditioned stimulus [US]). Fear learning was evident from the differential expressions of fear (CS(+) > CS(-)) at both the behavioral level (startle potentiation and US expectancy) and the neural level (in amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, and insula). We examined individual differences in discriminative fear conditioning by classifying participants (as conditionable vs. unconditionable) according to whether they showed successful differential startle potentiation. This revealed that the individual differences in the emotional expression of discriminative fear learning (startle potentiation) were reflected in differential amygdala activation, regardless of the cognitive expression of fear learning (CS-US contingency or hippocampal activation). Our study provides the first evidence for the potential of examining startle potentiation in concurrent fMRI research on fear learning.

摘要

为了深入了解恐惧学习中的个体差异,我们直接考察了辨别性恐惧条件反射的情绪和认知表现与其神经基础之间的关系。与之前关于恐惧学习的行为-神经(fMRI)研究不同——在之前的研究中,恐惧的情绪表现通常通过皮肤电导率来衡量——我们使用了恐惧增强的惊跳反应,这是恐惧的一个更可靠和更具体的指标。当我们获得同时的恐惧增强惊跳反应、神经影像学(fMRI)和 US 预期数据时,健康参与者接受了一个恐惧条件反射范式,其中两个条件刺激(CS(+)但不是 CS(-))与电击(非条件刺激[US])配对。在行为水平(惊跳反应增强和 US 预期)和神经水平(杏仁核、前扣带皮层、海马体和脑岛)上,都可以从恐惧的差异表达(CS(+)>CS(-))中看出恐惧学习的效果。我们通过根据参与者是否表现出成功的差异惊跳反应增强(可条件化与不可条件化)来对辨别性恐惧条件反射进行分类,从而考察了个体差异。这表明,辨别性恐惧学习(惊跳反应增强)的情绪表达个体差异反映在杏仁核激活的差异上,而与恐惧学习的认知表达(CS-US 关联或海马体激活)无关。我们的研究首次提供了证据,证明在恐惧学习的同时 fMRI 研究中检查惊跳反应增强的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d206/3400034/d83c129c7eb7/13415_2012_89_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验