Center for Health and Behavior, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Addiction. 2012 Oct;107(10):1774-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03903.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
Family history of alcohol use problems is a reliable determinant of alcohol use and problems in the population at large, but findings are inconsistent when this issue is examined in college and university students. No quantitative summary of this literature has been reported to date. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis on the effects of family history on substance use and abuse in college and university students.
A two-group contrast meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the differences in substance use and abuse between family history-positive and -negative students pursuing higher education. The studies that contributed data to this meta-analysis were conducted in five countries, with the majority of studies from the United States. A total of 65 published papers (53 samples) contributed data from 89 766 participants attending university or college. Effect sizes were coded for alcohol consumption, problems and use disorder symptoms, as well as other illegal drug use and abuse. Two independent coders calculated effect sizes and coded descriptive content about the papers, and discrepancies were reconciled. Family history was used as the grouping variable.
Family history had a minimal effect on alcohol consumption, with stronger effects on alcohol consequences (Cohen's d: 0.21-0.25), alcohol use disorder symptoms (Cohen's d: 0.24) and other drug involvement (Cohen's d: 0.37-0.86).
Relative to students without a family history of alcohol problems, students with positive family histories do not drink more, but may be at greater risk for difficulties with alcohol and drugs.
家族酗酒史是人群中普遍存在的酒精使用和问题的可靠决定因素,但在对大学生进行研究时,这一问题的发现并不一致。迄今为止,尚未有关于该文献的定量综述报告。本研究旨在对家族酗酒史对大学生物质使用和滥用的影响进行荟萃分析。
采用两组对比荟萃分析方法,评估接受高等教育的家族酗酒史阳性和阴性学生在物质使用和滥用方面的差异。为本次荟萃分析提供数据的研究在五个国家进行,其中大多数研究来自美国。共有 65 篇已发表的论文(53 个样本)提供了来自 89766 名大学生的数据。效应大小被编码为酒精消耗、问题和使用障碍症状,以及其他非法药物使用和滥用。两名独立的编码员计算了效应大小,并对论文的描述性内容进行了编码,解决了差异。家族史被用作分组变量。
家族史对酒精消耗的影响较小,但对酒精后果(Cohen's d:0.21-0.25)、酒精使用障碍症状(Cohen's d:0.24)和其他药物滥用(Cohen's d:0.37-0.86)的影响较大。
与没有家族酗酒史的学生相比,有阳性家族史的学生饮酒量并不多,但他们可能面临更大的酒精和药物滥用困难风险。