Department of Psychological Science, University of Missouri.
Instructional Services, University of Missouri.
Psychol Bull. 2021 Oct;147(10):1075-1123. doi: 10.1037/bul0000333.
Modern nosologies (e.g., ICD-11, DSM-5) for alcohol use disorder (AUD) and dependence prioritize reliability and clinical presentation over etiology, resulting in a diagnosis that is not always strongly grounded in basic theory and research. Within these nosologies, DSM-5 AUD is treated as a discrete, largely categorical, but graded, phenomenon, which results in additional challenges (e.g., significant phenotypic heterogeneity). Efforts to increase the compatibility between AUD diagnosis and modern conceptualizations of alcohol dependence, which describe it as dimensional and partially overlapping with other psychopathology (e.g., other substance use disorders) will inspire a stronger scientific framework and strengthen AUD's validity. We conducted a systematic review of 144 reviews to integrate addiction constructs and theories into a comprehensive framework with the aim of identifying fundamental mechanisms implicated in AUD. The product of this effort was the Etiologic, Theory-Based, Ontogenetic Hierarchical Framework (ETOH Framework) of AUD mechanisms, which outlines superdomains of cognitive control, reward, as well as negative valence and emotionality, each of which subsume narrower, hierarchically-organized components. We also outline opponent processes and self-awareness as key moderators of AUD mechanisms. In contrast with other frameworks, we recommend an increased conceptual role for negative valence and compulsion in AUD. The ETOH framework serves as a critical step towards conceptualizations of AUD as dimensional and heterogeneous. It has the potential to improve AUD assessment and aid in the development of evidence-based diagnostic measures that focus on key mechanisms in AUD, consequently facilitating treatment matching.
现代的酒精使用障碍(AUD)和依赖的分类学(例如 ICD-11、DSM-5)优先考虑可靠性和临床表现,而不是病因,导致诊断并不总是基于基础理论和研究。在这些分类学中,DSM-5 AUD 被视为离散的、主要是分类的,但分级的现象,这导致了额外的挑战(例如,显著的表型异质性)。为了增加 AUD 诊断与现代酒精依赖概念的兼容性,将其描述为维度的,并与其他精神病理学(例如其他物质使用障碍)部分重叠,这将激发更强有力的科学框架,并增强 AUD 的有效性。我们进行了一项系统综述,共纳入了 144 项综述,旨在将成瘾结构和理论整合到一个综合框架中,以确定与 AUD 相关的基本机制。这项工作的产物是 AUD 机制的病因、理论、发生层次框架(ETOH 框架),它概述了认知控制、奖励以及负性情绪和情感的超域,每个超域都包含更窄、层次化组织的成分。我们还概述了对立过程和自我意识作为 AUD 机制的关键调节因素。与其他框架相比,我们建议在 AUD 中增加负性情绪和强迫的概念作用。ETOH 框架是将 AUD 概念化为维度和异质的重要步骤。它有可能改善 AUD 的评估,并有助于开发基于证据的诊断措施,这些措施侧重于 AUD 的关键机制,从而促进治疗匹配。