Hedelin Hans
Department of Research and Development, Kärnsjukhuset, Skövde, Sweden.
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012 Aug;46(4):273-8. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.669403. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
This study aimed to evaluate the presence and importance of pain catastrophizing among men diagnosed with chronic abacterial prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) in a routine clinical setting.
61 men, mean age 46 ± 11 years, with a mean CP/CPPS history of 11 ± 11 years, completed the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) to evaluate pain catastrophizing, and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). They were also scored according to the UPOINT system.
The patients' mean scores were: IEEF-5 17.6 ± 7.3, NIH-CPSI pain subscale 11.1 ± 4.4, quality of life question 2.7 ± 1.6, quality of life impact subscale 6.9 ± 2.7 and CSQ catastrophizing score 15.3 ± 9.1. Patients with a high tendency for catastrophizing (CSQ score ≥20) (28%) had higher UPOINT and pain scores, worse quality of life and quality of life impact, but did not stand out regarding voiding dysfunction and ejaculatory pain.
Two distinctly different cohorts could be identified: a smaller cohort with a high degree of catastrophizing, severe pain and poor quality of life, and a larger one with a low degree of catastrophizing, less severe pain and moderately reduced quality of life. It is important in clinical practice to distinguish between the two groups since they require different therapeutic approaches.
本研究旨在评估在常规临床环境中,被诊断为慢性非细菌性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)的男性患者中疼痛灾难化思维的存在情况及其重要性。
61名男性,平均年龄46±11岁,平均CP/CPPS病史为11±11年,完成了美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)、简化麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)和应对策略问卷(CSQ)以评估疼痛灾难化思维,以及国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)。他们还根据UPOINT系统进行评分。
患者的平均得分分别为:IIEF-5为17.6±7.3,NIH-CPSI疼痛子量表为11.1±4.4,生活质量问题为2.7±1.6,生活质量影响子量表为6.9±2.7,CSQ灾难化评分15.3±9.1。灾难化思维倾向较高(CSQ评分≥20)的患者(28%)UPOINT评分和疼痛评分更高,生活质量及生活质量影响更差,但在排尿功能障碍和射精疼痛方面并不突出。
可以识别出两个明显不同的队列:一个较小的队列,具有高度的灾难化思维、严重疼痛和较差的生活质量;另一个较大的队列,具有低度的灾难化思维、不太严重的疼痛和中度降低的生活质量。在临床实践中区分这两组很重要,因为它们需要不同的治疗方法。