Department of Behavioral and Community Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Jan;71(1):249-55. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.671361. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
The aim was to test and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Oral Health Locus of Control (OHLoC) instrument and its relation to dental anxiety, self-efficacy and self-perceived oral health among Swedish adolescents.
A random sample of 758 (63% of 1208 invited) 19-year-old individuals in three residential areas in western Sweden (two rural, one urban) answered a set of questionnaires prior to a dental examination.
The face and content validity of the OHLoC was deemed good in pilot interviews with individuals of the target age. Explorative factor analysis verified the dimensions of the OHLoC sub-scales (internal, external, chance locus of control) with loadings from 0.503 - 0.812, explaining 54.6% of the variance. Construct validity was confirmed in relation to two other psychometric scales, on dental anxiety (DAS) and on general self-efficacy (GSE), with correlations in the expected directions. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, the internal sub-scale displayed the most consistent statistically significant associations with self-perceived oral health, also when accounting for gender, demography and health behavior. There were no significant differences between genders on the OHLoC, but females scored statistically significantly higher on the DAS (p = 0.005) and lower on the GSE (p = 0.021) than males.
The Swedish version of the OHLoC appears to have acceptable psychometric properties for use in an adolescent population.
旨在测试和评估口腔健康控制源量表(OHLoC)及其与瑞典青少年的牙齿焦虑、自我效能和自我感知口腔健康之间的关系的心理测量特性。
在瑞典西部三个住宅区(两个农村,一个城市),对 758 名(邀请的 1208 人中的 63%)19 岁的随机样本在牙科检查前回答了一组问卷。
在对目标年龄的个体进行的试点访谈中,OHLoC 的表面和内容效度被认为是良好的。探索性因素分析验证了 OHLoC 子量表(内部、外部、机会控制源)的维度,负荷系数为 0.503-0.812,解释了 54.6%的方差。与另外两个心理测量量表(牙齿焦虑量表(DAS)和一般自我效能感量表(GSE))的结构效度得到了确认,相关方向符合预期。在多元逻辑回归分析中,内部子量表与自我感知的口腔健康显示出最一致的统计学显著关联,即使考虑到性别、人口统计学和健康行为也是如此。在 OHLoC 上,性别之间没有显著差异,但女性在 DAS 上的得分显著高于男性(p = 0.005),在 GSE 上的得分显著低于男性(p = 0.021)。
瑞典版的 OHLoC 似乎具有可接受的心理测量特性,可用于青少年人群。