Suppr超能文献

五种常用含利多卡因的局部麻醉剂的比较及其对利多卡因及其代谢产物单乙基甘氨酰二甲苯(MEGX)血清水平的影响。

Comparison of five commonly-available, lidocaine-containing topical anesthetics and their effect on serum levels of lidocaine and its metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX).

机构信息

Plastic Surgery Department, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-8533, USA.

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J. 2012 May;32(4):495-503. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12442672. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Topical anesthetics are commonly applied for a variety of indications. Several lidocaine-containing topical anesthetics are available for purchase over the counter (OTC). Recently, the authors' group has shown that there is great interindividual discrepancy in the manner in which lidocaine is absorbed and metabolized for even a single OTC product.

OBJECTIVES

The authors compare five commonly-available lidocaine preparations and their levels of absorption when applied to the face. Three of the preparations are available OTC; two require prescriptions and were compounded in a pharmacy.

METHODS

Twenty-five subjects enrolled in this Institutional Review Board-approved study were randomly assigned to one of five groups. The five topical anesthetics were LMX-4 (4% lidocaine; Biopelle/Ferndale Laboratories, Ferndale, Michigan), Topicaine (4% lidocaine; Ebsa Laboratories, Jupiter, Florida), 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine (generic EMLA preparation; High Tech Pharmaceuticals, Amityville, New York), LET (4% lidocaine, 1:2000 epinephrine, and 0.5% tetracaine), and BLT (20% benzoncaine, 6% lidocaine, and 4% tetracaine). After a patch test for adverse reactions, the topical anesthetic was applied to each patient's face and neck and covered with an occlusive dressing for 60 minutes. Blood was drawn at 90, 120, 150, 240, and 480 minutes to measure serum levels of lidocaine and monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX).

RESULTS

The average age of the 17 women and eight men included in the study was 26 years (range, 22-62 years), and the average weight was 70.9 kg (range, 46.4-96.4 kg). The OTC preparations had the highest serum lidocaine and MEGX levels. Topicaine had the greatest serum levels of individual lidocaine absorption (0.808 µg/mL), followed by generic EMLA (0.72 µg/mL), LMX-4 (0.44 µg/mL), BLT (0.17 µg/mL), and LET (0.13 µg/mL). On average, Topicaine had the highest serum lidocaine and MEGX levels: 0.438 µg/mL and 0.0678 µg/mL, respectively. There were significant interindividual differences between the serum levels of MEGX and lidocaine in all groups except LET (P<.0001). There were significant differences between the 4% lidocaine-containing preparations (P=.0439); the 2.5% preparation had a greater absorption than the 4% lidocaine-containing preparation and the 6% lidocaine preparation (P=.0016). There were three adverse reactions in patients who received OTC preparations, one of which resulted in postinflammatory hyperpigmentation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that although topical anesthetics are considered safe, some individuals have unpredictably high absorption levels. This study also demonstrates that the concentration of lidocaine, the formulation of the drug, and the individual patient all have significant effects on serum levels of lidocaine. The authors recommend that even OTC topical anesthetics be used under the supervision of a healthcare professional to avoid adverse toxic effects and, in rare cases, death.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

背景

局部麻醉剂常用于多种适应症。有几种含有利多卡因的局部麻醉剂可在柜台购买(OTC)。最近,作者的研究小组发现,即使是单一的 OTC 产品,利多卡因的吸收和代谢方式也存在很大的个体差异。

目的

作者比较了五种常用的利多卡因制剂及其在面部使用时的吸收水平。其中三种制剂可 OTC 购买;两种需要处方,并在药房配制。

方法

本机构审查委员会批准的研究共纳入 25 名受试者,他们被随机分配到五组之一。五种局部麻醉剂分别为 LMX-4(4%利多卡因;Biopelle/Ferndale Laboratories,密歇根州 Ferndale)、Topicaine(4%利多卡因;Ebsa Laboratories,佛罗里达州 Jupiter)、2.5%利多卡因/2.5%丙胺卡因(通用 EMLA 制剂;High Tech Pharmaceuticals,纽约州 Amityville)、LET(4%利多卡因、1:2000 肾上腺素和 0.5%丁卡因)和 BLT(20%苯佐卡因、6%利多卡因和 4%丁卡因)。在进行不良反应贴斑试验后,将局部麻醉剂涂抹在每位患者的面部和颈部,并使用封闭敷料覆盖 60 分钟。在 90、120、150、240 和 480 分钟时抽取血液,以测量血清中的利多卡因和单乙基甘氨酸二甲酰胺(MEGX)水平。

结果

研究包括 17 名女性和 8 名男性,平均年龄为 26 岁(范围为 22-62 岁),平均体重为 70.9 公斤(范围为 46.4-96.4 公斤)。OTC 制剂的血清利多卡因和 MEGX 水平最高。Topicaine 具有最高的个体利多卡因吸收血清水平(0.808 µg/mL),其次是通用 EMLA(0.72 µg/mL)、LMX-4(0.44 µg/mL)、BLT(0.17 µg/mL)和 LET(0.13 µg/mL)。平均而言,Topicaine 具有最高的血清利多卡因和 MEGX 水平:分别为 0.438 µg/mL 和 0.0678 µg/mL。除 LET 外,所有组的血清 MEGX 和利多卡因水平均存在显著的个体间差异(P<.0001)。除 LET 外,4%利多卡因制剂之间(P=.0439)存在显著差异;2.5%制剂的吸收量大于 4%利多卡因制剂和 6%利多卡因制剂(P=.0016)。接受 OTC 制剂的患者中有三例出现不良反应,其中一例导致炎症后色素沉着过度。

结论

本研究表明,尽管局部麻醉剂被认为是安全的,但有些个体的吸收水平不可预测。本研究还表明,利多卡因的浓度、药物的配方以及个体患者都对血清利多卡因水平有显著影响。作者建议,即使是 OTC 局部麻醉剂,也应在医疗保健专业人员的监督下使用,以避免不良的毒性作用,在极少数情况下,甚至死亡。

证据水平

2。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验