Suppr超能文献

阿法替尼对比安慰剂用于厄洛替尼、吉非替尼治疗失败或两者都失败,以及一线或二线化疗后进展、转移性非小细胞肺癌患者(LUX-Lung 1):一项 2b/3 期随机试验。

Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): a phase 2b/3 randomised trial.

机构信息

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):528-38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70087-6. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Afatinib, an irreversible ErbB-family blocker, has shown preclinical activity when tested in EGFR mutant models with mutations that confer resistance to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. We aimed to assess its efficacy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with previous treatment failure on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors.

METHODS

In this phase 2b/3 trial, we enrolled patients with stage IIIB or IV adenocarcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance (ECOG) performance score of 0-2 who had received one or two previous chemotherapy regimens and had disease progression after at least 12 weeks of treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib. We used a computer-generated sequence to randomly allocate patients (2:1) to either afatinib (50 mg per day) or placebo; all patients received best supportive care. Randomisation was done in blocks of three and was stratified by sex and baseline ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2). Investigators, patients, and the trial sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (from date of randomisation to death), analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00656136.

FINDINGS

Between May 26, 2008, and Sept 21, 2009, we identified 697 patients, 585 of whom were randomly allocated to treatment (390 to afatinib, 195 to placebo). Median overall survival was 10·8 months (95% CI 10·0-12·0) in the afatinib group and 12·0 months (10·2-14·3) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 1·08, 95% CI 0·86-1·35; p=0·74). Median progression-free survival was longer in the afatinib group (3·3 months, 95% CI 2·79-4·40) than it was in the placebo group (1·1 months, 0·95-1·68; hazard ratio 0·38, 95% CI 0·31-0·48; p<0·0001). No complete responses to treatment were noted; 29 (7%) patients had a partial response in the afatinib group, as did one patient in the placebo group. Subsequent cancer treatment was given to 257 (68%) patients in the afatinib group and 153 (79%) patients in the placebo group. The most common adverse events in the afatinib group were diarrhoea (339 [87%] of 390 patients; 66 [17%] were grade 3) and rash or acne (305 [78%] patients; 56 [14%] were grade 3). These events occurred less often in the placebo group (18 [9%] of 195 patients had diarrhoea; 31 [16%] had rash or acne), all being grade 1 or 2. Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in 39 (10%) patients in the afatinib group and one (<1%) patient in the placebo group. We recorded two possibly treatment-related deaths in the afatinib group.

INTERPRETATION

Although we recorded no benefit in terms of overall survival with afatinib (which might have been affected by cancer treatments given after progression in both groups), our findings for progression-free survival and response to treatment suggest that afatinib could be of some benefit to patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who have failed at least 12 weeks of previous EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment.

FUNDING

Boehringer Ingelheim Inc.

摘要

背景

阿法替尼是一种不可逆的 ErbB 家族阻断剂,在具有 EGFR 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂耐药性突变的 EGFR 突变模型中进行的临床前研究中显示出活性。我们旨在评估其在先前接受 EGFR 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗失败的晚期肺腺癌患者中的疗效。

方法

在这项 2b/3 期试验中,我们招募了 IIIB 期或 IV 期腺癌患者和东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)表现(ECOG)评分为 0-2 的患者,这些患者接受了一种或两种先前的化疗方案,并且在至少 12 周的厄洛替尼或吉非替尼治疗后疾病进展。我们使用计算机生成的序列将患者(2:1)随机分配到阿法替尼(每天 50mg)或安慰剂组;所有患者均接受最佳支持性护理。随机分组以 3 为一组进行,按性别和基线 ECOG 表现状态(0-1 与 2)分层。研究者、患者和试验赞助商对治疗分配进行了盲法。主要终点是总生存期(从随机分组到死亡的时间),采用意向治疗进行分析。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00656136。

结果

在 2008 年 5 月 26 日至 2009 年 9 月 21 日期间,我们确定了 697 名患者,其中 585 名患者被随机分配到治疗组(390 名接受阿法替尼治疗,195 名接受安慰剂治疗)。阿法替尼组的中位总生存期为 10.8 个月(95%CI 10.0-12.0),安慰剂组为 12.0 个月(10.2-14.3)(危险比 1.08,95%CI 0.86-1.35;p=0.74)。阿法替尼组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)较长(3.3 个月,95%CI 2.79-4.40),安慰剂组为 1.1 个月(0.95-1.68)(危险比 0.38,95%CI 0.31-0.48;p<0.0001)。没有观察到完全缓解;阿法替尼组有 29 名(7%)患者有部分缓解,安慰剂组有 1 名患者有部分缓解。随后有 257 名(68%)阿法替尼组患者和 153 名(79%)安慰剂组患者接受了癌症治疗。阿法替尼组最常见的不良反应是腹泻(390 名患者中的 339 名,66 名,占 17%,为 3 级)和皮疹或痤疮(305 名患者,占 78%,56 名,占 14%,为 3 级)。这些事件在安慰剂组中较少发生(195 名患者中有 18 名,占 9%,腹泻;31 名,占 16%,皮疹或痤疮,均为 1 级或 2 级)。阿法替尼组有 39 名(10%)患者发生与药物相关的严重不良事件,安慰剂组有 1 名(<1%)患者发生。我们记录了阿法替尼组的两例可能与治疗相关的死亡。

结论

尽管我们在总生存期方面没有观察到阿法替尼的获益(这可能受到两组中进展后给予的癌症治疗的影响),但我们对无进展生存期和治疗反应的发现表明,阿法替尼可能对先前接受至少 12 周 EGFR 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗失败的晚期肺腺癌患者有一定的益处。

资金来源

勃林格殷格翰公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验