Discipline of Physiotherapy, Clinical and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chron Respir Dis. 2012 Aug;9(3):153-62. doi: 10.1177/1479972312440814. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of arm endurance training, arm strength training, a combination of arm endurance and strength training, and no arm training on endurance arm exercise capacity. A randomised controlled trial was undertaken with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subjects randomised into one of four groups to complete 8 weeks of training: (a) arm endurance training (endurance group) consisting of supported and unsupported arm exercises, (b) arm strength training (strength group) using weight machines, (c) a combination of arm endurance and arm strength training (combined group), or (d) no arm training (control group). The primary outcome measurement was endurance arm exercise capacity measured by an endurance arm crank test. Secondary outcomes included functional arm exercise capacity measured by the incremental unsupported arm exercise test and health-related quality of life. A total of 52 subjects were recruited and 38 (73%) completed the study. When comparing the arm endurance group to the control group, there was a significant increase in endurance time of 6 min (95% CI 2-10, p < 0.01) following the interventions. When comparing the combined group to each of the control, endurance and strength groups, there was a significantly greater reduction in dyspnoea and rate of perceived exertion at the end of the functional arm exercise test for the combined group following the interventions. The mode of training to be favoured to increase endurance arm exercise capacity is arm endurance training. However, combined arm endurance and strength training may also be very useful to reduce the symptoms during everyday arm tasks.
本研究旨在比较手臂耐力训练、手臂力量训练、手臂耐力和力量训练相结合以及不进行手臂训练对耐力手臂运动能力的影响。采用随机对照试验,将慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者随机分为四组中的一组,完成 8 周的训练:(a)手臂耐力训练(耐力组),包括支撑和非支撑手臂运动,(b)使用举重机进行手臂力量训练(力量组),(c)手臂耐力和手臂力量训练相结合(联合组),或(d)不进行手臂训练(对照组)。主要结局测量是通过耐力手臂曲柄测试测量的耐力手臂运动能力。次要结局包括通过递增非支撑手臂运动测试测量的功能性手臂运动能力和健康相关生活质量。共招募了 52 名受试者,其中 38 名(73%)完成了研究。当将手臂耐力组与对照组进行比较时,干预后耐力时间显著增加了 6 分钟(95%CI 2-10,p <0.01)。当将联合组与对照组、耐力组和力量组中的每一组进行比较时,干预后联合组在功能手臂运动测试结束时呼吸困难和感知用力程度的降低幅度明显更大。增加耐力手臂运动能力的首选训练方式是手臂耐力训练。然而,结合手臂耐力和力量训练也可能非常有用,可以减轻日常手臂活动中的症状。