Martirosian Smith Tovia E, Trowbridge Elisa R, Pastore Lisa M, Smith Steven C, Brennan Matthew C, Dooley Yashika, Matthews Catherine K, Ozel Begüm, Sutkin Gary, Hullfish Kathie L
From the Departments of *Obstetrics and Gynecology and †Urology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA; ‡Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; §Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX; ∥Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; ¶Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; and #Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;17(2):100-4. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31820e9df3.
: The objective of this study was to describe self-assessed student knowledge of female pelvic medicine (FPM) during the OBGYN clerkship.
: Students at 6 sites scored their knowledge of 12 FPM topics and 4 procedures both before and after their clerkship. Analysis included Wilcoxon tests, Spearman correlation, and univariate and multivariate models.
: A total of 323 students completed paired surveys. Mean knowledge scores (KSs) across FPM topics (1.40 ± 0.12; 95% confidence interval) and procedures (0.77 ± 0.08) increased significantly, with larger increases for topics (P < 0.001). Topic and procedure KSs were correlated (rs = 0.32, P < 0.0001). Mean KSs were significantly related to number and number of types of learning experiences (r = 0.13 and 0.08, both P < 0.001). Learning through text and inpatient encounters had independent effects on KS change in multivariate analysis (P = 0.01 and 0.007).
: Students reported increased knowledge although less for procedures than for topics. Text and inpatient learning independently increased students' self-assessed change in knowledge.
本研究的目的是描述妇产科实习期间学生对女性盆底医学(FPM)的自我评估知识。
6个地点的学生在实习前后对12个FPM主题和4种操作的知识进行评分。分析包括Wilcoxon检验、Spearman相关性分析以及单变量和多变量模型。
共有323名学生完成了配对调查。FPM主题(1.40±0.12;95%置信区间)和操作(0.77±0.08)的平均知识得分(KSs)显著提高,主题的提高幅度更大(P<0.001)。主题和操作的KSs具有相关性(rs = 0.32,P<0.0001)。平均KSs与学习经历的数量和类型显著相关(r = 0.13和0.08,均P<0.001)。在多变量分析中,通过文本学习和住院患者接触对KS变化有独立影响(P = 0.01和0.007)。
学生报告知识有所增加,尽管操作方面的增加少于主题方面。文本学习和住院患者学习独立增加了学生自我评估的知识变化。