Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1974 Oct;1(5):379-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1974.tb00273.x.
1 Four equal-sexed groups of eight normal subjects were given single doses of either (±)-propranolol (120 mg), (+)-propranolol (120 mg), diazepam (6 mg) or placebo using double-blind procedure and their effects studied under three types of experimental stress and at rest. 2 Finger tremor, EEG, averaged auditory evoked response, skin conductance, heart rate and respiratory rate were measured at each time of testing, and subjects also completed performance tests (reaction time, tapping speed and symbol copying) and subjective mood scales. 3 Neither (+)- nor (±)-propranolol had any beneficial effects on mood and physiological tests showed that, although adequate β-adrenoceptor blockade was achieved, there was no evidence of sedation. 4 Diazepam reduced subjective anxiety, significantly lessened the main amplitude of the auditory evoked response and also reduced the proportion of slower rhythms in the EEG. 5 The results suggest that (+)- and (±)-propranolol have no psychotropic effects on induced anxiety and that their modes of action are fundamentally different from that of diazepam.
四组各八位同性别正常受试者接受单剂量(±)-心得安(120mg)、(+)-心得安(120mg)、地西泮(6mg)或安慰剂,采用双盲程序,并在三种实验应激和休息状态下研究其作用。
在每次测试时测量手指震颤、脑电图、平均听觉诱发电位、皮肤电导、心率和呼吸率,并且受试者还完成了性能测试(反应时间、敲击速度和符号复制)和主观情绪量表。
(+)-和(±)-心得安对情绪均无有益影响,生理测试表明,虽然充分实现了β-肾上腺素能受体阻断,但没有镇静的证据。
地西泮降低了主观焦虑,显著减轻了听觉诱发电位的主要振幅,并减少了脑电图中较慢节律的比例。
结果表明,(+)-和(±)-心得安对诱导性焦虑没有精神作用,其作用模式与地西泮根本不同。