Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, 3418 Patrick Taylor Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(2):199-208. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.644606.
Inefficient operation of traffic in work zone areas not only leads to an increase in travel time delays, queue length, and fuel consumption but also increases the number of forced merges and roadway accidents. This study evaluated the safety performance of work zones with a conventional lane merge (CLM) configuration in Louisiana. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the crash rates for accidents involving fatalities, injuries, and property damage only (PDO) in each of the following 4 areas: (1) advance warning area, (2) transition area, (3) work area, and (4) termination area. The analysis showed that the advance warning area had higher fatality, injury, and PDO crash rates when compared to the transition area, work area, and termination area. This finding confirmed the need to make improvements in the advance warning area where merging maneuvers take place. Therefore, a new lane merge configuration, called joint lane merge (JLM), was proposed and its safety performance was examined and compared to the conventional lane merge configuration using a microscopic simulation model (VISSIM), which was calibrated with real-world data from an existing work zone on I-55 and used to simulate a total of 25 different scenarios with different levels of demand and traffic composition. Safety performance was evaluated using 2 surrogate measures: uncomfortable decelerations and speed variance. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine whether the differences in safety performance between both configurations were significant. The safety analysis indicated that JLM outperformed CLM in most cases with low to moderate flow rates and that the percentage of trucks did not have a significant impact on the safety performance of either configuration. Though the safety analysis did not clearly indicate which lane merge configuration is safer for the overall work zone area, it was able to identify the possibly associated safety changes within the work zone area under different traffic conditions.
工作区交通效率低下不仅会导致旅行时间延迟、排队长度和燃料消耗增加,还会增加强制并道和道路事故的数量。本研究评估了路易斯安那州具有传统车道合并 (CLM) 配置的工作区的安全性能。方差分析 (ANOVA) 用于比较以下 4 个区域中涉及致命、伤害和仅财产损失 (PDO) 的事故的事故率:(1) 预警区、(2) 过渡区、(3) 工作区和 (4) 终止区。分析表明,与过渡区、工作区和终止区相比,预警区的致命、伤害和 PDO 碰撞率更高。这一发现证实了需要改进发生合并操作的预警区。因此,提出了一种新的车道合并配置,称为联合车道合并 (JLM),并使用微观模拟模型 (VISSIM) 对其安全性能进行了检查和比较,该模型使用来自 I-55 上现有工作区的真实世界数据进行了校准,并用于模拟总共 25 种不同的场景,这些场景具有不同的需求和交通组成。使用 2 个替代指标评估安全性能:不舒适减速和速度方差。进行了统计分析,以确定两种配置之间的安全性能差异是否显著。安全分析表明,在低至中等流量率下,JLM 在大多数情况下优于 CLM,并且卡车的百分比对两种配置的安全性能都没有显著影响。虽然安全分析没有清楚地表明哪种车道合并配置对整个工作区区域更安全,但它能够在不同交通条件下识别工作区区域内可能相关的安全变化。